Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "What law has Kim Davis broken?" [View all]asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)24. jberryhill - thank you - I find this whole KIM I'm a BAC -episode
playing like reality TV - perhaps this could take the place of the Duggars....people seem to be so fascinated could be some AD money to be made...National attention...who knows - they might learn what LAW!
The plot line - the BAC - the feigned indignation (no, I do not buy into her 4 times married indignation) children?? - which husband..I am so confused.., the development of her marriages - her election to county clerk - her son working for her - and let's not forget she worked for her mom..more plot - the people of the community who voted her in - more lot - the religious bystanders outside the court house or the prison...
Pathetic rituals..pathetic all around...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If she prevents me from marrying my one true love, or whoever, and my and my love's
randys1
Sep 2015
#1
I think 1985 would be better, since the Christofascist law firm is pulling Davis' strings
jmowreader
Sep 2015
#6
Just contempt of court. The judge ordered her to do something. She did not do it. Contempt.
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#22
tell them if a judge orders them to pay Child Support....and they fail to do so...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2015
#29
I agree, because section 1983 is not a criminal statute and doesn't carry jail time.
Jim Lane
Sep 2015
#19
It gives you a scary look into their collective mindset. It is like when Ted Cruz loves the SCOTUS
Rex
Sep 2015
#21
They don't understand it because it is not in the second part of a sentence in the second Amendment
world wide wally
Sep 2015
#25
Not to mention cuckolding one husband by making him think the other husbands children are his...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2015
#31