Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Roland99

(53,345 posts)
20. You're not understanding the point
Sat Sep 5, 2015, 09:23 AM
Sep 2015

The point is that no one should have to opt to affirm to a different version of the wording. It should be one version and one version only. No reference to any make believe creatures in the sky of any type.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Signed! TheGunslinger Sep 2015 #1
I love the idea! Faux pas Sep 2015 #2
Done! hifiguy Sep 2015 #3
#1052. A long way to go. nm rhett o rick Sep 2015 #4
I didn't think they had to swear on anything, just swear like you do in court NightWatcher Sep 2015 #5
The Kentucky oath for officials ends with "so help me god." csziggy Sep 2015 #6
Under specific Kentucky law, jurors are allowed to substitute an affirmation onenote Sep 2015 #15
I'm in Florida and don't know if they allow this csziggy Sep 2015 #19
For your future reference, Florida also allows jurors to skip the "so help me God"s onenote Sep 2015 #26
That is pure fiction that anyone has to swear on anything, it's simply custom. MADem Sep 2015 #21
Hmmm. It's unconstitutional to require any oath, whether on the Bible or the Constitution. eallen Sep 2015 #7
Signed, sealed and delivered n/t Fritz Walter Sep 2015 #8
X marks the spot! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #9
I actually have little problem with a swear on the Bible MisterP Sep 2015 #10
Nothing in US law requires swearing on the Bible struggle4progress Sep 2015 #11
which is why this is a silly petition onenote Sep 2015 #14
+1,000! MADem Sep 2015 #22
Sometimes the ignorance of our own government and laws is truly astounding. branford Sep 2015 #30
+1,000! nt MADem Sep 2015 #33
But yet a bible is present almost always and assumed to be used Roland99 Sep 2015 #16
There's no chance a competent court will require "so help me God" struggle4progress Sep 2015 #17
You're not understanding the point Roland99 Sep 2015 #20
Because you say so? I think you are missing the point. MADem Sep 2015 #24
It's not a "majority rules" or "religous freedom thing" as you put it, Roland99 Sep 2015 #25
Good grief, listen to yourself!! "As it should be?" Because YOU say so? MADem Sep 2015 #28
Again, you're missing the point. Refer back to my previous two posts. Roland99 Sep 2015 #31
I fear you are the one who has missed the point. You can refer back to my previous posts, too. nt MADem Sep 2015 #34
This is your political opinion of how things should be. tritsofme Sep 2015 #29
That's really not how the Constitution works or what it requires. branford Sep 2015 #32
If I had my preferences, and thought it a winnable fight, I'd take "God" out of all legal language struggle4progress Sep 2015 #36
Most of my childhood our family was Jehovah's Witnesses, then Quakers. hunter Sep 2015 #12
Done. K&R. Scuba Sep 2015 #13
UNREC brooklynite Sep 2015 #18
signed. 5914. a great idea! n/t wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #23
Signed! haikugal Sep 2015 #27
You're not required to swear on the Bible? Spider Jerusalem Sep 2015 #35
I don't like this Idea. NutmegYankee Sep 2015 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Petition to require all g...»Reply #20