General Discussion

jeff47

(26,549 posts)

34. She can vote against it all she wants. She can vote for it all she wants.

Sun Sep 6, 2015, 12:19 PM

Sep 2015

When last week she was against it but this week she is for it, the pandering is obvious.

It was a bad deal when there were only 30 votes to sustain a veto. Now that there are enough votes to sustain a veto, it's a good deal.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wasserman Schultz backs Iran deal [View all] n2doc Sep 2015 OP

That's awesome... R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2015 #1

Yes, it is the difference between those who lead and jwirr Sep 2015 #18

Nice of AIPAC to autorize her to do that. Wilms Sep 2015 #2

and you have the nerve to wonder why she considered voting against dsc Sep 2015 #6

Lots of constituents wanted a war with Iraq. Wilms Sep 2015 #12

my point is that if the thanks she is going to get for doing the right thing dsc Sep 2015 #14

You have your point. Wilms Sep 2015 #23

A person should do the right thing because it's the right thing Flying Squirrel Sep 2015 #46

Geez, now they will need to find something else to bash her on still_one Sep 2015 #28

. Wilms Sep 2015 #31

Thank you. riversedge Sep 2015 #3

Good job, DWS! geek tragedy Sep 2015 #4

"Now that my vote would not stop nor advance the deal, I support it!!" (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #5

These entities are more transparent than saran wrap FlatBaroque Sep 2015 #7

and you have the nerve to wonder why she considered voting against dsc Sep 2015 #8

She should vote for the right things. Gore1FL Sep 2015 #29

She can vote against it all she wants. She can vote for it all she wants. jeff47 Sep 2015 #34

Now DWS can be an articulate spokesperson for the deal. She's super sharp oasis Sep 2015 #20

Amazing show of leadership Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #30

Agreed...I would have been impressed had she done it when it mattered...nt joeybee12 Sep 2015 #57

Now that she knows it cannot be overridden she has changed her position malaise Sep 2015 #9

Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #24

Really? Sorry you are off base. If anything if she voted no on the deal now still_one Sep 2015 #41

If she were not head of the DNC then the veto-proof majority Flying Squirrel Sep 2015 #47

Well then I guess I am sorry she didn't vote against the deal, because that would have fulfilled your still_one Sep 2015 #64

If you support her then you should be happy she didn't vote against it Flying Squirrel Sep 2015 #65

I don't live in Florida, I cannot vote for or against her. I also am not a member of the DNC committee, still_one Sep 2015 #66

Yep, very little of the criticism of her under this OP makes sense. nt stevenleser Sep 2015 #54

Great. Now, what has she done about the dearth of debates? n/t Triana Sep 2015 #10

Amazing comments on this OP - she just can't win oberliner Sep 2015 #11

Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #15

Actually it's f":- you Debbie. roody Sep 2015 #17

Yes, you can't win when you're a weather vane. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #33

But she voted with Obama and people are still giving her crap oberliner Sep 2015 #36

On this issue, she hasn't voted at all. jeff47 Sep 2015 #38

Publicly pledged to vote with Obama oberliner Sep 2015 #48

Time didn't start with her pledge. jeff47 Sep 2015 #63

The comments make clear how she could win. Jim Lane Sep 2015 #39

That's what she has now done oberliner Sep 2015 #49

No, she's late. Jim Lane Sep 2015 #52

Rumour and media speculation without the proof necessary for the outrage that was displayed. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #58

Has DWS commented on the report, or is the matter being kept secret? (n/t) Jim Lane Sep 2015 #59

Rumour and media speculation deserves no comment! As Clinton has also said...repeatedly. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #60

Then I draw my conclusions accordingly. Jim Lane Sep 2015 #62

Clearly she's part of the "Jewish conspiracy" either way villager Sep 2015 #40

I agree--no matter what SHE does, it is wrong. MADem Sep 2015 #55

She must have seen the petitions to replace her. mfcorey1 Sep 2015 #13

She certainly wants to keep her chairwomanship. mylye2222 Sep 2015 #16

Good grief. That's not the issue at all.... MADem Sep 2015 #56

I guess she zentrum Sep 2015 #19

And all this time... SHRED Sep 2015 #21

What does this mean? oberliner Sep 2015 #37

Okay SHRED Sep 2015 #42

President Obama also has great affinity for Israel oberliner Sep 2015 #43

Okay, the citizenship remark by me... SHRED Sep 2015 #44

Fair enough oberliner Sep 2015 #50

I am glad that she finally did the right thing. BlueMTexpat Sep 2015 #22

Easy to flip flop? SmittynMo Sep 2015 #25

i guess she had to do that. barbtries Sep 2015 #26

I guess the calls for her ouster are having an affect Babel_17 Sep 2015 #27

Completely surprised me! KaryninMiami Sep 2015 #32

Sure to disappoint many people here tritsofme Sep 2015 #35

KnR Hekate Sep 2015 #45

My, what a "Leader" greytdemocrat Sep 2015 #51

Well, that will certainly disappoint a cadre of people who wanted to stuff her under the bus. MADem Sep 2015 #53

Credit where it's due - good job. Drunken Irishman Sep 2015 #61