Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)

43. !

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Sun Sep 6, 2015, 01:55 PM

Sep 2015

Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:24 PM - Edit history (1)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That is a good read !

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In defense of Kim Davis [View all] struggle4progress Sep 2015 OP

What if everyone could just ignore the law if you didn't like it? Check this out: Liberty Belle Sep 2015 #1

I'm afraid I must disagree. PatrickforO Sep 2015 #2

Ahh, It was a joke nt Logical Sep 2015 #6

Oh. Well, as Agent Kay said, "No, Ma'am, we in the FBI don't have a sense of humor that we're PatrickforO Sep 2015 #8

:-) Logical Sep 2015 #34

It is meant to be sarcasm, and it isn't bad. "being married four times makes her an expert in her still_one Sep 2015 #29

Can't everyone see how this is totally tongue-in-cheek? SheilaT Sep 2015 #3

And pretty brilliant at that! Well done, struggle4progress! csziggy Sep 2015 #4

Time line Geronimoe Sep 2015 #14

Thanks - I didn't know about the timing csziggy Sep 2015 #19

No you are incorrect csziggy Sep 2015 #32

I agree still_one Sep 2015 #30

Always interesting to see who just reads and responds to the title alone (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #9

I saw the title of your OP and was ready to counter . . . brush Sep 2015 #5

Maybe she meets her 5th husband sadoldgirl Sep 2015 #7

Did you forget LiberalElite Sep 2015 #10

Brilliant, S4P. Brilliant! longship Sep 2015 #11

Yes! underpants Sep 2015 #27

I think I read that Husband #4 is also Husband #2. No Vested Interest Sep 2015 #12

Yes underpants Sep 2015 #31

Gays would never do that! AlbertCat Sep 2015 #38

A better defense might be to bring to the court's attention that George Washington . . . Petrushka Sep 2015 #13

Often families had to pay marriage bonds csziggy Sep 2015 #21

That must have made shot-gun marriages rather awkward. qwlauren35 Sep 2015 #25

Well, it still happened - but would get the couple kicked out csziggy Sep 2015 #28

Fascinating! qwlauren35 Sep 2015 #33

You'll go to the wedding with a bump on your belly and .... AlbertCat Sep 2015 #39

Interesting subject. Thank you for the research! Petrushka Sep 2015 #41

As a lesbian, I have fought too hard for equality. Aerows Sep 2015 #15

"Davis has refused licenses for all couples since the Supreme Court's ruling" struggle4progress Sep 2015 #35

It was a gay person on DU who made me understand lunatica Sep 2015 #44

Gay people have just as much right to John Poet Sep 2015 #16

It doesn't matter if Ms. Davis was married four times Sam_Fields Sep 2015 #17

It doesn't matter if Ms. Davis was married four times AlbertCat Sep 2015 #40

I dig that you think it's funny, but currently I am not into this sort of crap. Straight people need Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #18

"she has refused to hand out marriage licenses to same-sex and opposite-sex couples altogether" struggle4progress Sep 2015 #36

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER struggle4progress Sep 2015 #37

. . . Triana Sep 2015 #20

I hope you wrote all that bilge sarcastically? Betty Karlson Sep 2015 #22

Nicely done... SidDithers Sep 2015 #23

lol treestar Sep 2015 #24

I want it to be true. qwlauren35 Sep 2015 #26

Why do you think she's anti divorce? lunatica Sep 2015 #42

! Wash. state Desk Jet Sep 2015 #43