General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When Racism Slips Into Everyday Speech [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 10:03 PM - Edit history (1)
The whole original joke / saying is actually avoiding the object of whatever the person was thinking, right?
"If that's what you think ..." The more straightforward way to conclude would be with a different object for whatever the person was incorrectly thinking.
"You thought *that* but what's going to happen is *this.* You expected one thing, but you will find another thing."
The original joke was to subvert the expected way to conclude by turning "think" into a noun, which is fine, and I'd agree the modern bastardization loses the joke.
But it doesn't lose the meaning; on the contrary, it dumbs the joke down by replacing the "another think" with the much more pedestrian but logical "thing" the person has coming in place of the thing they expected.