General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amanda Marcotte: No, Porn Addiction Is Not Really A Thing [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)#1- the massive, sudden increase was due to a change in the definition, that's spelled our right in the article. Now, maybe the new definition is newer, better, and more comprehensive than the old one, but it's still not even close to logically accurate to call that an "increase".
It'd be like saying on tuesday we didn't call nose picking a felony and on wednesday we did, and lo and behold, from tuesday to wednesday there was a massive increase; "soaring rates" in felonious crime!
#2- seems to be specific to the NYC subway system, a limited example to be sure.
#3- people are taking it more seriously and reporting requirements are more stringent (see #1)... however, there is also a good amount of evidence out there that the "campus sex assault epidemic" is hyperbolicly overblown, certainly it is highly unlikely that the situation on the nation's college campuses is any different than it used to be.
#4- cant get the forbes link to load, but it seems to be a list of the most dangerous cities- again, not really relevant to general statistics of a rise or decline in crime.
#5- that's the UK, and they're saying convictions are up; another good thing, because it means the crime is being taken more seriously and effectively prosecuted. (emphasis added)
Look, it's pretty simple, and it's pretty inescapable; violent crime in the US, is down. Markedly. Statistically. Undeniably. Now, I believe that is more due to demographic factors- an aging population- than anything else, but the hippie in me would also like to believe the human animal is just generally starting to chillax a bit.
But it's also undeniable that porn is more available and widespread than it used to be.
So if the Andrea Dworkin hyperbole around what would happen vis a vis "porn makes people violent" were true, we would see a huge increase in crime which is NOT borne out by the statistics. Sorry.