Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
8. Marbury vs. Madison
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 05:23 PM
Sep 2015

A ruling from the early 1800s. Merely because right wingers do not accept the concept of judicial review does not mean it is not the law of the land for over 200 years.

If a state declared Catholicism to be the state religion, its legislature passed that, and the governor signed, meaning it is the will of the people of that state, then the SCOTUS could overrule it as a violation of the First Amendment. By the logic of that idiot who wrote the piece linked, they could not do that. Then the Bill of Rights would have no effect.

The legislature makes the law, the executive enforces the law, the judicial interprets the law. Conservatives don't like a SCOTUS ruling. Too damn bad. It's one of the branches of government and their job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This part is complete BS, SCOTUS rulings ARE law whether they like it or not steve2470 Sep 2015 #1
Agreed complete nonsense. Egnever Sep 2015 #2
Care to copy / paste the image here? I'm not turning adblock off just so they can get $0.001. n/t X_Digger Sep 2015 #3
Why bother? REP Sep 2015 #4
It seems to me that this guy is using faux logic. djean111 Sep 2015 #5
Thanks. You got it right, especially with your faux logic statement. Even Faux Noise IllinoisBirdWatcher Sep 2015 #11
We’re sorry, but a plugin/addon installed on your browser is interfering with the complete display.. L. Coyote Sep 2015 #6
You don't have to turn off Adblock. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #9
It's absolute nonsense and completely wrong. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #7
Marbury vs. Madison treestar Sep 2015 #8
Although courts don't create law in the LuvNewcastle Sep 2015 #10
That's about the dumbest piece I've ever read. Vinca Sep 2015 #12
this takes the cake. he's disputing settled law from 1803. unblock Sep 2015 #13
That's always the first one cited, but judicial review was firmly entrenched.. X_Digger Sep 2015 #15
The law that she is breaking is violating a court order and the 14'th amendment (nt) LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #14
That's easy. The article (which is from a tin-foil hat type Bircher website) PatrickforO Sep 2015 #16
Oh, and let's not forget the 8th, 9th and 14th amendments... PatrickforO Sep 2015 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone smarter than I, g...»Reply #8