Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 12:39 AM Sep 2015

California EPA Moves to Label Monsanto's Roundup 'Carcinogenic' [View all]

The California Environmental Protection Agency announced today that it plans to label glyphosate — the most widely used herbicide and main ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup — as a chemical "known to cause cancer." The World Health Organization's research arm also recently found that the chemical is probably carcinogenic to humans, and research has also linked glyphosate to the steep decline of monarch butterflies. And as we reported this week, scientists have increasingly raised new alarms about potential negative health impacts tied to Roundup, including a recent study suggesting that long-term exposure to tiny amounts of the chemical (thousands of times lower than what is allowed in drinking water in the US) could lead to liver and kidney problems.

Today's announcement from the EPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment is officially a "notice of intent" to list this pesticide as carcinogenic, giving the public an opportunity to comment on the proposal through October 5. The action falls under Proposition 65, a measure voters approved in 1986 that requires the state to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harms. The state regularly updates the list, which now includes hundreds of chemicals. Under Prop 65, businesses must provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before exposing people to a chemical on the list. The warning could be labels on a consumer product, workplace postings, distributed notices at apartment buildings, or a notice published in a newspaper.

Environmental activists celebrated the state EPA's announcement today, noting that it could be a first step in eventually restricting the use of the chemical. (The listing does not lead to a restriction or ban on sales of the product).

“California’s taking an important step toward protecting people and wildlife from this toxic pesticide,” Nathan Donley, staff scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity, a conservation nonprofit based in San Francisco, said in a statement. Donley noted that more than 250 millions pounds of glyphosate are used annually in the US, adding, “It’s nearly impossible for people to limit exposure to this toxin because it is just so widespread. That’s why we need much tighter controls on its use."

<snip>

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/SevenDays/archives/2015/09/05/california-epa-moves-to-label-monsantos-roundup-carcinogenic

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Great news and past due. n/t L. Coyote Sep 2015 #1
K&R awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #2
Well, when the only permissible "science" is that in the service of the bottom line... villager Sep 2015 #4
I always though Roundup should come in an orange container Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #3
Agent Orange is a mixture of 24D and 245T, phenoxy herbicides. PufPuf23 Sep 2015 #11
Agent Orange was a mixture of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #12
I must have been posting while you were researching. PufPuf23 Sep 2015 #41
This puts it in the same category as aspirin, oral contraceptives, and alcohol. Nailzberg Sep 2015 #5
And coffee too. progressoid Sep 2015 #6
You are free to swap out your "Morning Joe" with Monsanto's finest.... villager Sep 2015 #7
Which would you rather drink? n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #9
You ask that question as if the answer is supposed to be somehow signficant Major Nikon Sep 2015 #22
If you're not prepared to use a product incorrectly NuclearDem Sep 2015 #24
It's kinda like asking someone why they wouldn't want to shove a toothbrush up their ass Major Nikon Sep 2015 #25
And working third shift. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #10
You guys really *are* working third shift, villager Sep 2015 #14
You know, when it comes to these accusations of being paid posters NuclearDem Sep 2015 #15
Am waiting for an example of "understanding" rather than snarkery, villager Sep 2015 #16
From what I've seen of your posts on this matter NuclearDem Sep 2015 #17
More of your scientific understanding and rational discourse! villager Sep 2015 #18
I just always wonder arikara Sep 2015 #19
Because it's an issue worth debating. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #23
Well I guess that cuts both ways arikara Sep 2015 #27
Because 1 in 5 US children live below the poverty line and I want families to afford to eat. Nailzberg Sep 2015 #29
Thank you for acknowledging. All of those products must be labeled. So should GMO's. n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #8
Those products will be labeled as carcinogens. GMOs aren't carcinogens. Nailzberg Sep 2015 #28
LOL. Aspirin, alcohol, and birth control aren't labeled because they're carcinogens pnwmom Sep 2015 #30
I think you're thinking of two different things Orrex Sep 2015 #32
You're right -- and I'm not saying that aspirin, etc., are labeled for GMO content. pnwmom Sep 2015 #34
Sure they could. Orrex Sep 2015 #35
There is no compelling reason if you are convinced by the GMO producers research. pnwmom Sep 2015 #36
Suspicion isn't a compelling reason. Orrex Sep 2015 #37
Suspicion based on past history is a compelling enough reason, IMO, pnwmom Sep 2015 #38
Suspicion is not sufficient because it's not a matter of trust Orrex Sep 2015 #39
If you don't mind, what is your response to the fact that until a few years ago GMO researchers pnwmom Sep 2015 #40
No. They are labeled as required by Prop 65 as carcinogens. Nailzberg Sep 2015 #33
But what about "SCIENCE" ??!!11!!?? GreatGazoo Sep 2015 #13
Ever since CA made Disneyland put up "substances here may cause cancer" signs all over the place, Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #20
Or conversely, the line in the movie "Bliss" is increasingly correct: villager Sep 2015 #21
my son hides the round up MFM008 Sep 2015 #26
If he objects to doing his job, then he should quit or be fired Orrex Sep 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California EPA Moves to L...