General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attention Atheist, can you please do me a favor and listen to me....... [View all]WestCoastLib
(442 posts)Just because it's one piece from an old philosopher doesn't make it philosophy.
This is based in direct observation.
The only way to twist it otherwise is to completely deny the meaning of the words. In actuality, many religious peoples do not claim their God to be omnibenevolent. There are plenty, even today, that claim a vengeful god, so really I don't even think it should be used as "the definition" as it probably doesn't encompass the majority's take on their god.
And, admittidly, it would be difficult to think of a test that could test for a God that was omniscient & omnipotent, but not omnibenevolent, however, if you are using a definition that includes omnibenevolent along with omniscient & omnipotent, then that does fail direct observation...It's not just philosophy.