General Discussion

roamer65

(37,945 posts)

20. No Suckabee, the 14th amendment trumps the Scott decision.

Reply to Are_grits_groceries (Original post)

Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:39 PM

Sep 2015

Amendments that are ratified nullify any conflicting SCOTUS constitutional interpretations. The SCOTUS cannot disobey the Constitution, it can only interpret it.

That is why you will have to amend the Constition to protect your precious little fetuses, you jackass. But that will not happen..hahahah.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Huckabee: Dred Scott Decision �Remains To This Day The Law Of The Land� [View all] Are_grits_groceries Sep 2015 OP

It would seem there are quite a few supreme court decisions and constitutional amendments Mass Sep 2015 #1

Was he homeschooled? Gad! n/t haikugal Sep 2015 #2

Worse than that - he was church schooled. I cannot jwirr Sep 2015 #12

*riiiing* *riiiinnnnggg* Hong Kong Cavalier Sep 2015 #3

Every history teacher in the country shenmue Sep 2015 #9

At the very least, Huck's did. louis-t Sep 2015 #14

Maybe, maybe not. Either way, the closet is a psychologically damaging thing. closeupready Sep 2015 #4

clarify for me please Huckabee=gay man? irisblue Sep 2015 #6

How does one miss that slavery is no longer the law of the land in the US? merrily Sep 2015 #5

Nobody can be this dumb and still have hifiguy Sep 2015 #7

I don't even have a well-functioning autonomic nervous system but I'm still way LiberalLoner Sep 2015 #13

I never cease to be amazed by these people. mmonk Sep 2015 #8

It's just not amazing anymore with them... freebrew Sep 2015 #25

When I was a child and had just learned that a classmate's parents were Republicans I said EWWWW - LiberalElite Sep 2015 #38

Certain aspects of it remain jberryhill Sep 2015 #10

Interesting. Calista241 Sep 2015 #43

Not According to Westlaw Stallion Sep 2015 #11

I thought that the racists were on Donald Trump�s side. Initech Sep 2015 #15

There's an embarrassment of riches klook Sep 2015 #22

Even though that is a horribly inaccurate statement, what does it have to do with Kim Davis? Rex Sep 2015 #16

I think the idea is that unjust laws ought not to be followed? oberliner Sep 2015 #37

Fuckabee is a really stupid man malaise Sep 2015 #17

Straight from Barton mercuryblues Sep 2015 #18

Translation: if elected, Huckster promises to send runaway darkies home to massah! struggle4progress Sep 2015 #19

No Suckabee, the 14th amendment trumps the Scott decision. roamer65 Sep 2015 #20

This is what the right calls an intellectual Major Nikon Sep 2015 #21

See what happens when you don't understand history or the goverment. sinkingfeeling Sep 2015 #23

makes total sense lykemike Sep 2015 #24

Join the group, as a woman I am not capable of making my own decisions, according to the GOP LynneSin Sep 2015 #32

Thank goodness that man has no chance of ever MineralMan Sep 2015 #26

Ironic. He probably has a greater chance here than almost anywhere else, and could jtuck004 Sep 2015 #40

Sure, the 14th Amendment supersedes it, but Republicans think the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional tclambert Sep 2015 #27

Stephen Colbert had a word for how conservatives choose to interpret the Constitution LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2015 #30

Huckabee chose inappropriate caselaw. no_hypocrisy Sep 2015 #28

huckabee seems to be misinformed about everything. samsingh Sep 2015 #29

THIS, is why Mike Huckabee isn't even qualified to be President of his local homeowner association LynneSin Sep 2015 #31

once more Micky proves he has no mind Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #33

huckabee isn't worth the hate he riles up in me. spanone Sep 2015 #34

Ted Cruz allegedly graduated from some third-rate podunk law school. (Joking about third-rate, etc. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #35

The constitution just doesn't exist to these people IronLionZion Sep 2015 #36

Huckabee is not a segregationist as I claimed on a similar thread. gordianot Sep 2015 #39

I see, so people being property is just a question of selective enforcement.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #41

I am trying to remember PATRICK Sep 2015 #42

Oh so you support your activist judges, Mike. Judges are arbiters of law, not Lawmakers, that's Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #44

What.An.Ass. Lifelong Protester Sep 2015 #45