It's perfectly clear that the ass who wrote those horrible letters to Bravenak has lost...

[lumberjack_jeff]

114. Anyone remember the 2004 Bin Laden "letter to america"?

http://www.aljazeera.com/archive/2004/11/200849163336457223.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Osama_bin_Laden_video

On Oct. 29, 2004, just four days before the U.S. presidential election, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-Laden released a videotape denouncing George W. Bush. Some Bush supporters quickly spun the diatribe as “Osama’s endorsement of John Kerry.” But behind the walls of the CIA, analysts had concluded the opposite: that bin-Laden was trying to help Bush gain a second term.

This stunning CIA disclosure is tucked away in a brief passage near the end of Ron Suskind’s The One Percent Doctrine, which draws heavily from CIA insiders. Suskind wrote that the CIA analysts based their troubling assessment on classified information, but the analysts still puzzled over exactly why bin-Laden wanted Bush to stay in office.

According to Suskind’s book, CIA analysts had spent years “parsing each expressed word of the al-Qaeda leader and his deputy, [Ayman] Zawahiri. What they’d learned over nearly a decade is that bin-Laden speaks only for strategic reasons. …

“Their [the CIA’s] assessments, at day’s end, are a distillate of the kind of secret, internal conversations that the American public [was] not sanctioned to hear: strategic analysis. Today’s conclusion: bin-Laden’s message was clearly designed to assist the President’s reelection.

I doubt there are enough Sanders supporters around to qualify as "we" who would be so stupid as to believe a letter like the one sent to Bravenak would do their candidate any good.

It's often simpler to assume that when shit happens - in this case denigrating Sanders supporters at DU - it was because someone wanted it to happen, and that the intimidation Bravenak experienced is simply collateral damage.