Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anti-war protesters were right. Iraq invasion has led to chaos. [View all]Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)8. Dem Establishment in 2016 puts up a candidate who voted to authorize the travesty
When it looks like the Establishment candidate might be faltering, they put forth two more names who voted for the epic tragedy.
I personally know people who marched, called, and begged Clinton, Kerry, and Biden to vote NO on the Iraq War resolution. Some will never, ever, in any circumstances, vote for anyone who authorized the biggest American manmade disaster of their lives.
Almost as if the Democratic Establishment wants to lose in Nov 2016.
I'm hoping the people ignore the establishment and choose a different candidate, one who voted against the Iraq War. I wholeheartedly support Bernie, and truly think he's our best shot for victory in November 2016.
Happy to see you posting again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What was most to Halliburton's advantage? Two different options at two two different times.
maddiemom
Sep 2015
#61
"the cost has been too great" < I don't think the costs have even started yet. There is a big
jtuck004
Sep 2015
#4
Dem Establishment in 2016 puts up a candidate who voted to authorize the travesty
Dems to Win
Sep 2015
#8
I can't forget that video of Wes Clark telling about the 7 countries we would invade.
madfloridian
Sep 2015
#36
Also it does not help when your occupying force leaves behind guns, ammo, armored vehicles
Rex
Sep 2015
#70
"Call Congress right fucking now!" has become a reality instead of a tag line!
CTyankee
Sep 2015
#31
The same crew, Third Way Dems and repubs, will do it all again when the war drums
Zorra
Sep 2015
#54
Project for a New American Century should be all the evidence anyone needs to convict Cheney
Rex
Sep 2015
#74
Said it then, I'll say it again, "You can start a war, but you can't just stop it."
L. Coyote
Sep 2015
#79
It was supposed to be, in their crackpot plans, a quick and dirty conquest. The $$$$$ would be in
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#91
Well, yes, that too, however, cheney*/bush* knew (well cheney*knew, bush* muddled through it...
Raster
Sep 2015
#92
I still beg to differ. They built the US's largest embasssy ever in Iraq. I think they wanted an
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#95
I don't think we differ that much. Yes, we built the world's largest, most hardened embassy in Iraq
Raster
Sep 2015
#96
Heh---Your allusion to Puerto Rico got me thinking of "West Side Story." "I like to be in the
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#103
Iraq seems to be a major cause, especially regarding Kurds and Iran ...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Sep 2015
#89
Yet another "N S, S" moment for the media to take note of, too little, too late.
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#90
I remember how anthropologists who understood the region tried to be heard...
polichick
Sep 2015
#101