Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 06:18 AM Sep 2015

DraftKings, FanDuel could face first significant legal challenge after hearing request [View all]

A ranking member of the Energy and Commerce requested a hearing about the relationship of fantasy sports to gambling, potentially the initial step in what is believed to be the first direct legal challenge to the exploding daily fantasy sports industry.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) requested the hearing in the governing body that oversees professional sports and gambling Monday afternoon. He wants to scrutinize the difference in gambling on sports and playing fantasy and to examine the close ties between sports leagues and teams and the fantasy industry, including daily fantasy titans DraftKings and FanDuel.

DraftKings and FanDuel have received hundreds of millions in venture capital, money the daily fantasy sites used to purchase advertisements. Viewers this weekend were pummeled by commercials for the sites, which in part promoted Pallone’s request for a hearing.

“Anyone who watched a game this weekend was inundated by commercials for fantasy sports Web sites, and it’s only the first week of the NFL season,” Pallone said in a statement. “These sites are enormously popular, arguably central to the fans’ experience, and professional leagues are seeing the enormous profits as a result. Despite how mainstream these sites have become, though, the legal landscape governing these activities remains murky and should be reviewed.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2015/09/14/draftkings-fanduel-could-face-first-significant-legal-challenge-after-hearing-request/

Sure seems like gambling to me.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
N.J. wants to get into sports betting. The teams have been blocking N.J. Hoppy Sep 2015 #1
True oberliner Sep 2015 #4
I thought, judging from the ads, that FanDuel was a gambling site. Vinca Sep 2015 #2
Exactly oberliner Sep 2015 #3
While I Completely Agree. . . ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #5
The "so what" is that Krispy wanted to have sports betting in N.J. so he could tax it. Hoppy Sep 2015 #35
Not My Point ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #42
O.K. agree. Hoppy Sep 2015 #43
Wow---that didn't take long. trumad Sep 2015 #6
Yeah it was pretty overwhelming oberliner Sep 2015 #9
It's just as bad, if not worse on sports talk radio.. frylock Sep 2015 #33
It is gambling but it should be legal Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #7
I have mixed feelings oberliner Sep 2015 #10
I see your point, but I think in a lot of ways the cat is out of the bag Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #12
I see yours as well oberliner Sep 2015 #15
rhis is none of anybodies business. AngryAmish Sep 2015 #8
there is a pretty clear exception for games of skill/knowledge fishwax Sep 2015 #11
Poker is a game of skill, Sports betting requires knowledge oberliner Sep 2015 #16
fantasy sports are specifically excepted fishwax Sep 2015 #22
Right oberliner Sep 2015 #24
I don't think those scenarios are particularly plausible fishwax Sep 2015 #27
Here's the thing oberliner Sep 2015 #29
you think a Tom Brady will risk losing a game for a partial cut of a far-from-guaranteed 150K? fishwax Sep 2015 #31
Probably not oberliner Sep 2015 #34
These sites are clearly exploiting what they perceive as a legal loophole to allow sports betting. Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #13
Gambling or not, I'm fine this. Frankly, I think the UK model of gambling regulation closeupready Sep 2015 #14
Do they allow this extent of tv advertising in the UK for gambling? oberliner Sep 2015 #17
I don't believe the NFL is complicit; to the contrary, I believe it is the NFL closeupready Sep 2015 #18
DraftKings Announces Sponsorships With 12 NFL Teams To Kick Off 2015-16 Season oberliner Sep 2015 #19
You're not gambling on the outcome of games, just that you're better than the next average Joe Baclava Sep 2015 #20
You are gambling on something else oberliner Sep 2015 #21
Yeah, but you're gambling on a collection of players from different teams hifiguy Sep 2015 #23
What about this scenario: oberliner Sep 2015 #25
It's theoretically possible, I guess, hifiguy Sep 2015 #26
There are smaller tournaments that cost over $20K to enter oberliner Sep 2015 #28
You don't bet on fantasy teams, you play your players against others - that's all Baclava Sep 2015 #36
You are betting that your collection of players will score more points than others oberliner Sep 2015 #40
You think it's sports betting? Try calling your bookie to make a fantasy bet. ha ha Baclava Sep 2015 #44
Like the lottery is gambling - why don't states make that illegal? Baclava Sep 2015 #37
There is some hypocrisy there certainly oberliner Sep 2015 #41
IMHO - average person who wishing to win $$$ off these sites benld74 Sep 2015 #30
I back whatever legislation it takes to stop the endless stream of commercials on TV and radio.. frylock Sep 2015 #32
Buy a DVR - I haven't watched any commercials on any programs I want to watch for over a decade Baclava Sep 2015 #38
I have friends that do that.. frylock Sep 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DraftKings, FanDuel could...