Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When researchers trolled conspiracy nuts with random false info, they bought it every time [View all]CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)108. It is because...
...sociology is the only science that can explain why so many people believe in pharmaceuticals.
The industry would like you to believe that it spends millions of dollars and countless hours making sure 'their' treatment works.
Well, since it doesn't work for everybody (for whatever reason) the science of sociology is employed. Get a Doctor to say that it does so work. In fact, make a big advertising campaign to tell everybody that "...it does so work." Nobody wants to be outside saying the opposite of what "doctors" are saying. They say it makes us look stupid.
However, if you look around you see that a lot of institutions that we consider sacred, exist not because they are doing a good job but because they serve a social need apart from their institutional objectives. Churches for example don't actually deliver 'salvation', but they serve as social hubs that keep everybody interested. Schools don't actually deliver an education but they serve several social functions in the acculturation process.
The point is, people care more about belonging to a 'tribe' than they do about the actual beliefs of that tribe. Once you get past the need to belong to a group, you can believe what YOU want. And then, presumably, you will find that it is ALL about 'beliefs'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When researchers trolled conspiracy nuts with random false info, they bought it every time [View all]
HuckleB
Sep 2015
OP
The Universe is like that. Many, many directions. And I'm certain I could troll you.
hunter
Sep 2015
#22
True, the 3rd tower was not hit by a plane. It was hit by a gigantic fucking building!
ieoeja
Sep 2015
#25
Yes, there were numerous news report that WTC 7 was in danger of collapsing since it was severely
cpwm17
Sep 2015
#29
Guess what? MOST people don't seek out opposing viewpoints that "challenge their views." Moreover,
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#32
People often believe fiction and falsehoods. (See: Lies about Saddam, Americans' Belief in).
WinkyDink
Sep 2015
#33
People are gullible. And I think some CT nuts here are just messing with us at times. nt
Logical
Sep 2015
#35
Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, W. Quattrocchi
HuckleB
Sep 2015
#43
Any law enforcement officer, lawyer, historian, or reporter worth their salt
NuclearDem
Sep 2015
#114
Yeah, what would a history major know about the process of collecting historical data?
NuclearDem
Sep 2015
#122
I am sure there are those that see conspiracies in every thing. But there are also those that
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#50
I mean those that only cry CT when it goes against their worldview and not otherwise.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#90
Exactly. What's unspoken in all this is the assertion that one must never question...
villager
Sep 2015
#76
Those that push baseless fear should be exposed. The best way is to have open discussion.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#95
When I say shut down discussion, I don't mean with argument I mean by trying to censor.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#101