Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(37,305 posts)

4. I guess if you wipe out all benefits to individuals that would work.

Wed May 23, 2012, 01:49 AM

May 2012

But if people don't pay taxes and only receive benefits, that sounds like a great recipe for overspending and fiscal irresponsibility.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let's say we combine income and capital gains... [View all] cthulu2016 May 2012 OP

actually it would sorta piss me off too hfojvt May 2012 #1

It might have some issues. limpyhobbler May 2012 #3

What is the fascination with a flat tax rate? Warren Stupidity May 2012 #5

I don't care what Y is. Your idea sucks. badtoworse May 2012 #6

well no, the government would only take half of Warren Stupidity May 2012 #7

I'm well aware that the 50% would apply only to marginal income. badtoworse May 2012 #9

well I completely agree that flat tax schemes are bullshit. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #11

LOL. Like one DUer told me: "It's bigotry--against the RICH!". nt Romulox May 2012 #8

From those to whom much is given, much is asked in return. bemildred May 2012 #10

isn't there a way to define the difference between income and wages? Volaris May 2012 #12