Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When I click on a post and there is only a link, [View all]steve2470
(37,481 posts)41. I admit to doing that on very very rare occasions, when I feel really lazy
I did it recently with the hunk story. I figured if anyone really cared about the hunk, they wouldn't mind clicking the link to ABC News. Of course, my subject line always carries the original headline of the story, which gives you a good clue about the link. Oh well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep. Whatever they are doing it sucks. If I see that the link leads there I back right out.
GoneFishin
Sep 2015
#22
If the poster can't be bothered to include an excerpt, I can't be bothered to click on the link.
scarletwoman
Sep 2015
#11
I automatically consider any link without accompanying text or an archive.today link...
Shandris
Sep 2015
#15
I ignore it too. If you can't at least tell me why I should click on it, then forget it
lunatica
Sep 2015
#25
I posted a link earlier but it was to a NYT article and the title was in the link.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2015
#29