General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Pope's comments on family and marriage seem very much open to interpretation-WRONG [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,767 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]But, on this issue, the Pope has been abundantly clear.[/font]
http://www.catholic.com/blog/jimmy-akin/pope-francis-on-abortion-and-homosexual-marriage
[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother, and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of Gods law engraved in our hearts.
Cardinal Bergoglio continued: Let us not be naive: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy Gods plan. It is not just a bill (a mere instrument) but a move of the father of lies who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]It is hard for there to be room for interpretation when the pope has talked on this topic before.
Now if you want to focus solely upon the economic aspect of the pope that is fine; but, unless you are posting in the catholic safehaven, you can't expect to do so on DU without facing push back.
Simply put, given his global affluence and influence, the pope is quite possibly the single greatest enemy to women's and LGBTQ rights in the world. No one who is deeply supportive of those issues or secularism, are going to be pleased to see him PRAISED on a website that is supposed to be for allies to their cause.
Imagine that all these pro-pope threads were pro-Santorum? Or pro-Pat Robertson? Or pro-David Duke? Do you think liberals would stay quiet with that?
There are allies to economic justice who are not homophobic or misogynists to praise. Why insist on praising one who has hurt so many people?
How about focusing on someone who is pro-economic justice and pro-lgbtq.[/font]