Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
17. No, we force them to be robots.
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 10:42 AM
Sep 2015

Lots of "OMG CRIME IS EVERYWHERE PROTECT MY BABY!!!!" parents pushed through zero-tolerance policies. Zero-tolerance means zero judgement calls. School officials have no choice but to act like robots.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Our Grandson had a similiar issue. Wellstone ruled Sep 2015 #1
"Zero tolerance" BS Recursion Sep 2015 #2
Exactly What I Was Thinking! ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #11
Zero tolerance policies should be unconstitutional. Initech Sep 2015 #78
Zero Tolerance. Brought to you by the WOD. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #92
I think this would fall under 'crime of passion' Are_grits_groceries Sep 2015 #3
Zero Tolerance Idiocy sharp_stick Sep 2015 #4
ZT is more like 30-40 years old and we've been seeing the consequences for 15-20 Pacifist Patriot Sep 2015 #40
it's legal and morally right marym625 Sep 2015 #5
His parents have just hit the lottery. Lawsuit city. closeupready Sep 2015 #6
No, they really haven't. jeff47 Sep 2015 #15
zero-tolerance means school is liable for the blind kid getting beaten. KittyWampus Sep 2015 #22
Only if they don't enforce the policy on the bully. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23
I wonder if the bully learned his lesson yuiyoshida Sep 2015 #53
I expect he'll be like most bullies, and blame the victim for the bully's actions. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #61
Unfortunately you are right sarisataka Sep 2015 #27
Oh yes they do - they'll find something to sue on, and win. closeupready Sep 2015 #31
:eyes: jeff47 Sep 2015 #41
Okay. You aren't here to have a discussion. Got it. closeupready Sep 2015 #47
Because claiming any "my feelings got hurt" lawsuit wins in CA jeff47 Sep 2015 #63
California law does not require physical symptoms to be present in either an Glassunion Sep 2015 #74
Enablers. lpbk2713 Sep 2015 #7
No, we force them to be robots. jeff47 Sep 2015 #17
+1,000,000 yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #97
don't know how well these things work but OriginalGeek Sep 2015 #8
I updated my OP to include your post. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #10
Happy to help OriginalGeek Sep 2015 #16
Zero tolerance idiocy strikes once again romanic Sep 2015 #9
"treating the ableist bully like a victim" Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #12
and the bully was promptly released to his parents. I don't see anywhere where it said that niyad Sep 2015 #43
Ten bucks says this bully grows up to be a police officer... n/t backscatter712 Sep 2015 #58
quite likely niyad Sep 2015 #62
No suspension mentioned could just be the reporting. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #100
you make excellent points. niyad Sep 2015 #115
I don't think the school is right. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2015 #13
I did not read anywhere that the attacker was suspended. He was arrested and then released. LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #14
Well, in third grade I got into a fight with another kid who was bullying the class "retard" malthaussen Sep 2015 #18
Won't anyone think of the children!!!?!?!!1!!! Glassunion Sep 2015 #19
Had a similar situation 4Q2u2 Sep 2015 #20
They Don't Get To Have An Opinion On Your Answer ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #24
Can never go wrong Fishing your Child 4Q2u2 Sep 2015 #25
I Get Ya! ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #35
Now Now 4Q2u2 Sep 2015 #85
Sorry ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #99
I had a similar situation with a better outcome. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2015 #46
Both boys were suspended 4Q2u2 Sep 2015 #83
The Administrators should be held accountable for allowing blind kid to get beaten. KittyWampus Sep 2015 #21
EVERY adult, teacher, janitor, secretary who saw it yet didn't intervene is culpable HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #39
And that is why cloudbase Sep 2015 #104
One size fits all also eliminates the need to make judgements HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #105
My youngest son is visually impaired--legally blind--the one who is now a grad student mnhtnbb Sep 2015 #26
THEATRE KID HERE, now mother of THEATRE major. elehhhhna Sep 2015 #114
Outrageous. SoapBox Sep 2015 #28
Wow damnedifIknow Sep 2015 #29
No good deed goes unpunished. magical thyme Sep 2015 #30
I'm having that engraved on my urn. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2015 #48
That kid can play on my team ANY DAY !!!! nt clarice Sep 2015 #32
So did the bully get suspended for beating on a blind kid? Rex Sep 2015 #33
I'm torn here. cwydro Sep 2015 #34
I bet this is not the first time this has happened dbackjon Sep 2015 #44
I agree. cwydro Sep 2015 #55
Agreed - but with some people talking does nothing dbackjon Sep 2015 #56
I was bullied as a child. cwydro Sep 2015 #66
Possible he has been bullied himself dbackjon Sep 2015 #69
That's my thought also. cwydro Sep 2015 #71
Shoving him to the side would be a form of violence; glad the bully got to feel the pain he was glowing Sep 2015 #45
Indeed, that is my take also. uppityperson Sep 2015 #90
It all makes me so sad. cwydro Sep 2015 #91
Unfair zero-tolerance crap. Back when I was a kid... MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #36
Hmm, will he get a White House invite? Microsoft swag? riderinthestorm Sep 2015 #37
Zero tolerance TNNurse Sep 2015 #38
Unfortunately, given the quality of the people they hire, it's not a bad assessment Demeter Sep 2015 #54
I don't see where the bully who was beating up on the visually disabled kid was suspended. niyad Sep 2015 #42
IF not, then the school is showing favoritism under a zero tolerance rule. Rex Sep 2015 #49
Many School Districts while having anti-bullying policies, do not enforce them and often punish Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #50
Zero tolerance garbage. backscatter712 Sep 2015 #51
Some shitheads just need a savage beating. Nothing else gets through to them. backscatter712 Sep 2015 #52
+1000000000000 dbackjon Sep 2015 #57
I agree. Absolutely! n/t radicalliberal Sep 2015 #64
+100000000000000000000000 Initech Sep 2015 #79
More zero tolerance lunacy LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #59
If I were the principal of that school, I would have given Cody a medal. radicalliberal Sep 2015 #60
That'll teach him not to intervene on behalf of a blind kid being bullied. Orrex Sep 2015 #65
defense is NOT the same as counter-attack hfojvt Sep 2015 #67
What nonsense, so YOU would let a blind kid get beat up to stay out of trouble. Rex Sep 2015 #76
actually I have broken up a fight hfojvt Sep 2015 #101
Not as much of a game as hockey. Events like these are important in people's lives. Red Mountain Sep 2015 #111
Hmmm.... Disinterested Party Sep 2015 #82
Your logic does not follow... Glassunion Sep 2015 #88
if you take a swing at me hfojvt Sep 2015 #103
And we wonder why this happens later in life: HughBeaumont Sep 2015 #68
I hope there's a gofundme Prism Sep 2015 #70
If a student had to step in to stop a public assault on a disabled child LittleBlue Sep 2015 #72
Self-defense HAS to be part of any any-bullying strategy bluestateguy Sep 2015 #73
Wouldn't zero tolerance rules just lead to people standing by not intervening when a crime occurs? abelenkpe Sep 2015 #75
Yes, it is a dumb as shit policy but the authoritarian/control freaks love it. Rex Sep 2015 #77
Zero tolerance for people who dare to stand up for the disabled. Lancero Sep 2015 #80
Is there another source? hollysmom Sep 2015 #81
A nice vacation for him taught_me_patience Sep 2015 #84
Yeah... And kicked off the football team, and a suspension in his acedemic record. Glassunion Sep 2015 #95
that happened to my son in grade school lunatica Sep 2015 #86
Of course he was get the red out Sep 2015 #87
The big question is could he, and others, intervened without hitting the bully? uppityperson Sep 2015 #89
Personally I feel the response was appropriate. Glassunion Sep 2015 #94
Good question. I doubt anyone at that (or most) schools are versed in how... Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #96
Nice hit -- down like a sack of oranges. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #93
Zero tolerance started in 1995 by the Feds. oneshooter Sep 2015 #98
Nothing has ever changed knightmaar Sep 2015 #102
He is a stand up kid libodem Sep 2015 #106
I'm surprised they didn't suspend the blind kid as well d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #107
years ago my then 5th grader took on the school bully defending a smaller classmate dembotoz Sep 2015 #108
Time spent in the penalty box is not all bad. Glassunion Sep 2015 #109
The matter of the student being suspended at Huntington Beach High School has changed mrdmk Sep 2015 #110
Is there anyone who actually supports zero-tolerance? PersonNumber503602 Sep 2015 #112
I support public schools, but many are run by fucking idiots with no common sense davidn3600 Sep 2015 #113
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»High school teen who defe...»Reply #17