Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. Does Penny Pritzker count?
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:57 AM
Sep 2015


Technically, she's got her own bank.



An Interview with Tim Anderson on Obama's Commerce Nominee, Penny Pritzker, the Sub-Prime Queen

The Privilege of the Pritzkers

by DENNIS BERNSTEIN
CounterPunch, May 3-5, 2013

EXCERPT...

TA: $38 billion. One publication listed eight casinos, another listed 13, with each license worth a half a million dollars. There is another $5-7 billion in casinos. When you own 13 casinos for 5-7 billion, you are a player in the casino business. That’s just the hotels and casinos. There are many other companies they own such as the second largest chewing tobacco company, which they sold for 3.5 billion dollars. They actually owned the second and third largest chewing tobacco company, but have since off-loaded those for billions of dollars. Many of their assets are not what society considers clean assets, but hey don’t care. As far as money goes, they want it. When it comes to casinos or chewing tobacco companies, they don’t care. Their wealth is almost incalculable, because according to Forbes magazine, they are the only family in America to have off shore tax-free trusts because they were grandfathered in. Their off shore trust can ship money back to their family tax-free. It was grandfathered in because their grandfather got it through Congress – he was smart to see the future and got it done. Congress closed the loophole and grandfathered him in. Forbesmagazine wrote about the Pritzker’s off shore trust, they emphasized that there are over 1000 separate trusts. Many families have two or three different savings accounts to keep track of what money belongs to who, but when you have over 1000 different trusts to handle the family estate it’s very hard to comprehend how much wealth there is and how many businesses they control. A few years ago, Penny sold TransUnion, the largest credit reporting agency in America, but there’s a question about whether she sold it to herself by selling it to various hedge funds which her family has a large interest in. Until she sold it, you could say that Penny Pritzker had more files on every citizen in America than the CIA and FBI combined, because everybody has a credit score and credit report. Penny Pritzker had the credit scores and report on every single citizen in America.

SNIP...

TA: She had TransUnion while she had Superior Bank, so she controlled the credit scores of everybody who was getting a subprime loan. You pay a higher interest on your subprime loan based on your credit score. Whether or not it was ever brokered between the credit bureau and the bank, we don’t know, but we know the same people control both entities.

SNIP...

TA: Superior Bank was acquired back in 1989 as part of the original savings and loan giveaway by M, D and E Wall. As I wrote a in a paper for an economic conference in Denver, Superior Bank was sold to the Pritzkers for 42.5 million dollars. They changed the name from Lion Savings and Loan to Superior Bank after they acquired it. Lion Savings and Loan was sold to the Pritzkers just to put up money for the capital. But as government reports show, they only put up a million dollars cash and pledged their assets as the difference, the capital. That’s not supposed to be done, but they are privileged people so they get privileged deals. After they acquired this for $1 million they also got $640 million in tax credits.

SNIP...

TA: The tax credits were designed so they could use it in any entity they wanted. They didn’t have to use it on what they bought. It could be sold on the open market for value, the credits could be used to file back taxes or warehouse them for future taxes. So for a million dollars, they got 640 million dollars for agreeing to take over Superior Bank, which they then looted for years then gave it back to the government with an enormous loss to the uninsured depositors and the whole subprime industry.

CONTINUED...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/05/03/the-privilege-of-the-pritzkers/



How about Jacob Lew?

William K. Black explains how Dr. Wall Street will continue bleeding the patient with leaches to health through austerity.



President Obama and Jacob L. "Jack" Lew walk near Marine One.



Jacob Lew: Another Brick in the Wall Street on the Potomac

William K. Black
Assoc. Professor, Univ. of Missouri, Kansas City; Sr. regulator during S&L debacle

EXCERPT...

The unobvious aspects of the pattern compound these problems. First, Obama likes to surround himself with failures. Geithner set the pattern. He was supposed to be the principal regulator of most of the largest U.S. bank holding companies. He was an abject failure. His speeches and his statements at the Federal Reserve System's FOMC meetings during the crisis demonstrate that he remained clueless to the end. For reasons of brevity, I discuss only three of his failures as Treasury Secretary below.

Lew has gone from failure to failure. He was one of the architects of both of the Clinton administration's disastrous statutory deregulatory actions that helped produce the epidemic of accounting control fraud that drove the Great Recession.

Emanuel and Daley were failures as directors of Fannie and Freddie. Lew was a failure at Citicorp's proprietary derivatives trading arm. That failure is particularly dangerous because the purpose of the Volcker rule was to ensure that federally insured banks did not take proprietary positions in derivatives. Obama has put failed anti-regulators in positions where they can best undermine the reregulatory effort that is essential to reduce the risk and harm of future crises.

Obama's senior financial advisors have also failed ethically. Lew's great moral challenge was whether he would be honest about his errors. Honesty is essential to preventing future harm. Lew failed this second, less obvious, test as well. The CBS special notes:

During a 2010 Senate hearing to confirm him as White House budget chief, Lew seemed to soft-pedal the role of financial deregulation in the housing crash, saying, &quot I don't) personally know the extent to which deregulation drove it, but I don't believe that deregulation was the proximate cause."


CONTINUED w/Links...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/jacob-lew-another-brick-i_b_2446848.html



How many hard working, sincere people have been tossed from their homes over the last seven years? Oh well.

As for the President's Cabinet, take those who get paid to leave Wall Street to work in Washington. Please.



Michael Froman and the revolving door

By Felix Salmon December 11, 2009

Michael Froman is one of those behind-the-scenes technocrats who never quite makes it into full public view. But according to Matt Taibbi, he’s one of the most egregious examples — up there with Bob Rubin, literally — we’ve yet seen of the way the revolving door works between business and government generally, and between Citigroup and Treasury in particular.

I’m not sure how much of this information is new, but a lot of it was new to me, especially the bit about Froman “leading the search for the president’s new economic team” — while he was still pulling down a multi-million-dollar salary at Citigroup, no less. Apologies for quoting at length:

Leading the search for the president’s new economic team was his close friend and Harvard Law classmate Michael Froman, a high-ranking executive at Citigroup. During the campaign, Froman had emerged as one of Obama’s biggest fundraisers, bundling $200,000 in contributions and introducing the candidate to a host of heavy hitters — chief among them his mentor Bob Rubin, the former co-chairman of Goldman Sachs who served as Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton. Froman had served as chief of staff to Rubin at Treasury, and had followed his boss when Rubin left the Clinton administration to serve as a senior counselor to Citigroup (a massive new financial conglomerate created by deregulatory moves pushed through by Rubin himself).

Incredibly, Froman did not resign from the bank when he went to work for Obama: He remained in the employ of Citigroup for two more months, even as he helped appoint the very people who would shape the future of his own firm. And to help him pick Obama’s economic team, Froman brought in none other than Jamie Rubin, a former Clinton diplomat who happens to be Bob Rubin’s son. At the time, Jamie’s dad was still earning roughly $15 million a year working for Citigroup, which was in the midst of a collapse brought on in part because Rubin had pushed the bank to invest heavily in mortgage-backed CDOs and other risky instruments…

On November 23rd, 2008, a deal is announced in which the government will bail out Rubin’s messes at Citigroup with a massive buffet of taxpayer-funded cash and guarantees… No Citi executives are replaced, and few restrictions are placed on their compensation. It’s the sweetheart deal of the century, putting generations of working-stiff taxpayers on the hook to pay off Bob Rubin’s fuck-up-rich tenure at Citi. “If you had any doubts at all about the primacy of Wall Street over Main Street,” former labor secretary Robert Reich declares when the bailout is announced, “your doubts should be laid to rest.”

It is bad enough that one of Bob Rubin’s former protégés from the Clinton years, the New York Fed chief Geithner, is intimately involved in the negotiations, which unsurprisingly leave the Federal Reserve massively exposed to future Citi losses. But the real stunner comes only hours after the bailout deal is struck, when the Obama transition team makes a cheerful announcement: Timothy Geithner is going to be Barack Obama’s Treasury secretary!

Geithner, in other words, is hired to head the U.S. Treasury by an executive from Citigroup — Michael Froman — before the ink is even dry on a massive government giveaway to Citigroup that Geithner himself was instrumental in delivering. In the annals of brazen political swindles, this one has to go in the all-time Fuck-the-Optics Hall of Fame.

Wall Street loved the Citi bailout and the Geithner nomination so much that the Dow immediately posted its biggest two-day jump since 1987, rising 11.8 percent. Citi shares jumped 58 percent in a single day, and JP Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley soared more than 20 percent, as Wall Street embraced the news that the government’s bailout generosity would not die with George W. Bush and Hank Paulson.


How much influence did Froman have over the appointment of Geithner as Treasury secretary? Geithner, who wanted to become Treasury secretary and who as New York Fed president was a central (if not the central) figure in orchestrating the massive Citigroup bailout just after the election, knew what Froman’s job was in the Obama transition team, and knew that Froman was a senior executive at Citigroup.

CONTINUED...

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/12/11/michael-froman-and-the-revolving-door/



Dual Citizenship in Wall Street and Washington is more than a physical address. It's a state of mind.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Geithner and Summers FreakinDJ Sep 2015 #1
Geithner was never Wall Street. Summers wasn't cabinet Recursion Sep 2015 #2
BS. He now serves as president of Warburg Pincus, a Wall Street private equity firm Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #4
What, was Obama supposed to see into the future? Recursion Sep 2015 #9
Yes. I can. It shows how beholden he is to Wall Street. Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #21
Erm, all cabinet positions have lucrative post-job opportunities. joshcryer Sep 2015 #27
For sure, but Geithner is off the list too. Hortensis Sep 2015 #31
But you can agree that "to Wall Street" is different from "from Wall Street", right? (nt) Recursion Sep 2015 #35
Overly literal much? merrily Sep 2015 #6
What are you talking about? His only private sector job was CFR which is a think tank Recursion Sep 2015 #10
What part of "overly literal" is mystifying? merrily Sep 2015 #15
Which of those jobs are you possibly calling "Wall Street"? Recursion Sep 2015 #16
Again, what part of "overly literal" is mystifying to you? merrily Sep 2015 #18
Well what the hell does "Wall Street" mean to you, then? Recursion Sep 2015 #19
What part of "accuracy" is a problem ? treestar Sep 2015 #36
Kindly link me to an inaccurate statement I've made about Wall Street. Thanks. merrily Sep 2015 #41
It is the revolving door WITH Wall Street TM99 Sep 2015 #3
He thinks this shows us! LMAO. merrily Sep 2015 #7
No, give me an example Recursion Sep 2015 #11
You have been given examples. TM99 Sep 2015 #14
No, I haven't Recursion Sep 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily Sep 2015 #20
Jack Lew & Michael Froman. Holder didn't & doesn't work on Wall Street but his clients are there think Sep 2015 #30
Thank you; I had missed Lew Recursion Sep 2015 #32
Another dodge treestar Sep 2015 #37
Or you could just read my Post #3 TM99 Sep 2015 #39
In Japan it is called "Amakudari" Bonobo Sep 2015 #40
AG Loretta Lynch has worked both sides. nt Ilsa Sep 2015 #5
When? Recursion Sep 2015 #13
I read that one of her first clients at Hogan was Ilsa Sep 2015 #22
Does Penny Pritzker count? Octafish Sep 2015 #8
Does "Wall Street" just mean "Banking"? Recursion Sep 2015 #12
Of course, as Wall Street means vacuuming up the wealth created by workers. Octafish Sep 2015 #23
Of course in English as we use it, 'Wall St' means 'Banking and Finance' not the location Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #25
No, it doesn't mean "banking" to most people, it means "finance" Recursion Sep 2015 #26
So that's one person so far. joshcryer Sep 2015 #29
Lew was at Citi; that's pretty uncontroversially "Wall Street" Recursion Sep 2015 #34
nice try my friend. mopinko Sep 2015 #24
Rec. joshcryer Sep 2015 #28
K&R! stonecutter357 Sep 2015 #33
good one treestar Sep 2015 #38
So some of the most recognizable neoliberals in the nation connected to Rubin mmonk Sep 2015 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which of Obama's cabinet ...»Reply #8