Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Illinois illegally seizes bees resistant to (Monsanto) Roundup; kills remaining queens [View all]GarroHorus
(1,055 posts)89. Right here
510 ILCS 20/2-1)
Sec. 2-1. Nuisances. All bees, colonies, or items of bee equipment, where bee diseases, bee parasites or exotic strains of bees exist; or hives that cannot be readily inspected; or colonies that are not registered, are declared to be nuisances to be regulated as prescribed by the Department.
If the Department finds by inspection that any person is maintaining a nuisance as described in this Section, it shall proceed to regulate the nuisance by methods or procedures deemed necessary for control in accordance with rules and regulations of the Department.
If the owner or beekeeper cannot be found or will not consent to the terms for regulation of the nuisance, the Department shall notify in writing the owner or beekeeper, disclose the fact that nuisance exits and prescribe the method by which the nuisance may be abated. The notice declaring that a nuisance exists and ordering its abatement shall include:
(1) a statement of conditions constituting the
nuisance;
(2) establishment of the time period within which the
nuisance is to be abated;
(3) directions, written or printed, pointing out the
methods that shall be employed to abate the nuisance;
(4) a statement of the consequences should the owner
or beekeeper fail to comply.
The notice may be served personally or by certified mail with a return receipt requested. The directions for abatement of a nuisance may consist of a printed circular, bulletin or report of the Department, the United States Department of Agriculture or others, or an extract from such document.
If the person so notified refuses or fails to abate the nuisance in the manner and in the time prescribed in the notice, the Department may cause the nuisance to be abated. The Department shall certify, to the owner or beekeeper, the cost of the abatement. The owner or beekeeper shall pay to the Department any costs of that action, within 60 days after certification that the nuisance has been abated. If the costs of abatement are not remitted, the Department may recover the costs before any court in the State having competent jurisdiction.
(Source: P.A. 88-138.)
They gave him notice and told him the method of abatement was to destroy the bees and burn them along with all affected hives, then bury the ashes under at least six inches of topsoil. When he failed to comply within the period directed to do so, the Department took action to cause the nuisance to be abated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
198 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Illinois illegally seizes bees resistant to (Monsanto) Roundup; kills remaining queens [View all]
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
OP
so the theory is that Monsanto wants a monopoly on bees resistant to their roundup?
KurtNYC
May 2012
#7
I think the resistant bees are one line of evidence in proving round-up kills bees. n/t
Ian David
May 2012
#18
No doubt he has years of evidence. Insan(e)to is a villainous criminal, plain and simple
Dont call me Shirley
May 2012
#82
Actually I do doubt it. Roundup effects on bees is not exactly an unknown area.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#87
Monsanto are pure, utter evil, and I say this meaning it entirely and without reservation.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#17
The evil of Monsanto-we as consumers, must fight for labeling of all GMO food products
crunch60
May 2012
#48
I'm trying to understand this...they don't want anyone developing bees resistant to that stuff....
LiberalLoner
May 2012
#10
And think about the other fact that this news piece demonstrates - the Big Agri firms
truedelphi
May 2012
#39
There is no evidence Roundup affects bees and plenty of people doing research on it.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#31
And that is a red herring/false choice. Of course they do. But so what? Doesn't mean that is the
yellowcanine
May 2012
#182
Who is THEY? Whether someone said that or not it is not actually relevant.
yellowcanine
Jun 2013
#193
I did not say atrazine doesn't break down in the soil: I said it can persist a long time. It can.
yellowcanine
Jun 2013
#195
Also glyphosate has been around since 1974 and your idea that it hasn't been researched
yellowcanine
Jun 2013
#196
That's a good point. And the only other source I can find is the nutjob site, "Natural News." n/t
Ian David
May 2012
#15
The evil gubamint might have seized the bees, but what about the 'research?'
msanthrope
May 2012
#59
I noticed that too. The bees were seized because inspectors detected foulbrood.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#20
If you read the Prairie Avocate article it's pretty clear where his bees are.
GarroHorus
May 2012
#32
That's an assumption, and that's the beekeeper's point. He's not getting answers
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#44
58 years of experience in bee keeping vs. 12 years as a what, corporate hack?
Dont call me Shirley
May 2012
#85
Well then let's hope the source of the original story isn't sharing underwear with Glenn Beck:
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#22
I would just edit your OP to link directly to the Prairie Advocate article. n/t
Ian David
May 2012
#33
hard to take the source seriously on a serious matter, when he trashes OWS and compares Carter among
maddezmom
May 2012
#52
I am disabled with very little energy and I thankfully have little knowledge of nut-job sites.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#104
Well the truth of the matter is of some dispute so source has to be considered.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#65
It also presents a great opportunity for you to direct Progressive web traffic to right-wing sites.
Ian David
May 2012
#79
No - what if this source wants to spread BS to discredit legitmate complaints against Monsanto?
KurtNYC
May 2012
#99
Yeah, I finally bowed deeply to those who refuse to click the source link in the first link I posted
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#135
First you have to offer something of substance, as opposed to something of ridicule.
msanthrope
May 2012
#54
I could link back to DU and people would chide me for less-than-golden sources.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#162
How does that assertion relate to the OP? If you read all of the replies it is clear that this case
yellowcanine
May 2012
#80
It's no assertion, use your search engine to find Monsanto connections to government.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#102
I don't always have the time to link people to stories. Everyone has a search engine if they care.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#128
"Everybody has a search engine." Oh for pity's sake. You really don't get it.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#129
I'm surprised they haven't bred GM bees, spread them around and claimed patent theft
Marrah_G
May 2012
#53
The evidence is certainly a lot better than for Roundup, that's for sure.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#130
"No, it's neonicotinoids. There's really no doubt now." Actually there is.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#139
Yeah right. "And they were probably the industry cover up." Who is "they" then.
yellowcanine
May 2012
#181
This is like a scene out of a science fiction horror movie. Monsanto must be held accountable
ladjf
May 2012
#86
Illinois is a pay-to-play state. If you don't pay, you don't get to play.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#91
Did you check the link in the story to the original article? I've posted it in the OP
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#103
If you want to piss of your livestock-farming neighbors, keep sick animals with a communicable
Ikonoklast
May 2012
#105
Good lord, please search Monsanto + government or most any topic you choose.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#142
One type of poison definitely cannot effect other things. That's madness.
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#147
Roundup Birth Defects: Regulators Knew World's Best-Selling Herbicide Causes Problems
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#152
I am always suspicious of anyone who "knows better" than all of the others in the same
yellowcanine
May 2012
#120
Illegally. I want them and Monsanto to pay dearly for this. They want to be able to have their
jwirr
May 2012
#127
The way I understand it he was not given the chance before they killed the bees.
jwirr
May 2012
#148
Roundup Birth Defects: Regulators Knew World's Best-Selling Herbicide Causes Problems
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#154
And I now question whether Roundup has any potential to cause birth defects
GarroHorus
May 2012
#168