Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rich Democrats Don’t Care About Income Inequality Any More Than Rich Republicans [View all]
Rich Democrats Dont Care About Income Inequality Any More Than Rich RepublicansA new study questions preconceived notions about politics and income equality.
by Ethan Wolff-Mann * Sept. 23, 2015 * Time (business section)
The Democratic party might be know for promoting income equality, but according to a new study, its rich elites dont care about it any more than Republicans.
Professors from U.C. Berkeley, Boston University, Yale Law School, and University of Maryland-College Park recently set up an experiment to test how groups with varying levels of elite status in society would distribute wealth. There were three different groups involved in the studyone representing average Americans (roughly 50/50 Republicans and Democrats), a group of intermediate elite University of California-Berkeley undergrads, and a group of Yale Law students, assumed to be in particularly high positions of wealth and influence in the future.

The results of the study were summed up by two of its authors in a Slate post, when they wrote:
Regardless of party, the elite donors whose money dominates politics, and the elite officeholders
whose decisions set policy, dont value economic equality.
The researchers came to this conclusion after a series of experiments in which participants were asked to divide money between themselves and an anonymous person in order to gauge selfishness. A second element to the study was added due to the fact that it wasnt always free to give money. In some cases, giving was cheap for every $1 sacrificed, $10 went to the anonymous beneficiary. In other cases, it was expensive to give. Giving away $1 only meant that the other person received a measly 10 cents. To make the experiments more realistic, the wealth redistribution was real, and participants were paid out at the end of the study based on their decisions.
http://time.com/money/4046099/income-inquality-democrats-republicans/
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rich Democrats Don’t Care About Income Inequality Any More Than Rich Republicans [View all]
99th_Monkey
Sep 2015
OP
Some of them around here state time and time again that they care more for social issues.
stillwaiting
Sep 2015
#96
The best way to share wealth is to support a safety net in your own country that makes
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#61
Bernie can hang with anyone, but he would not push for the same or similar policies.
merrily
Sep 2015
#38
Huh? Posting a photo of Presidents means I can't tell a conservative from a liberal now?
merrily
Sep 2015
#68
And a rich white person is not racist to a rich back person, but to none rich blacks, now that is a
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#14
Or the immigrant status, or the yellow skin or red skin or even jail time.
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#32
Roger That - HRC Represents The 1% First And Always - A Perfect 1% Stealth Canididate
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#20
The Clintons ARE in top-tier of 1%-ers themselves as well. "CLINTONS’ INCOME TOPS 99.9% OF AMERICANS"
99th_Monkey
Sep 2015
#24
I may have to edit that post. It seems closer to their combined INCOME that year.
merrily
Sep 2015
#50
If FDR could comprehend it, I suspect Bill and Hillary could too. Whether they do or not is a more
pampango
Sep 2015
#25
We don't know what motivated FDR. However, FDR never tried to play like he had no money.
merrily
Sep 2015
#40
All 99% are not in pain. And 99% means an annual income of under 389K*.Broad brush painting
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#46
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks - And Their MIC, Media And Political Minions
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#48
Who are not the young students still in college included in this single social study.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#49
Too facile and too low. On income alone, it's $389,000 per annum. (And 50% are below $52,000)
merrily
Sep 2015
#69
The title of the thread is based on a false premise. Folks want to go with it, be my guest.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#103
It's not only the bankrolling. It's things like the media, the debate schedule, claiming
merrily
Sep 2015
#43
I offer this only in the spirit of consideration, but why do you think that the...
Shandris
Sep 2015
#56
You have to have been "poor" to understand anything about the poor and therefore can not fashion
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#59
It's called taxing the very rich, at much higher rates, like we had w/ the Eisenhower Administration
99th_Monkey
Sep 2015
#60
Do you think that anyone can really 'earn' a billion dollars a year?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2015
#99
Jealously is a green eyed monster, and threads like this are good evidence of that truth.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#104
Someone ought to recall under what circumstances Bill Clinton and Barack Obama grew up
DFW
Sep 2015
#115
I wish the dialogue were about *wealth* inequality rather than *income* inequality.
Marr
Sep 2015
#92
Voters figured that out quite a while ago. See the poll numbers for both Political Parties. And see
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#87
For people who are both Democrats and also Wealthy Privileged Elites, to which group do you
GoneFishin
Sep 2015
#98
These people care very deeply... you'll have to excuse me, sniff... about the injustice of it all
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#109