Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
23. Of course, as Wall Street means vacuuming up the wealth created by workers.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:27 PM
Sep 2015


The Shocking Redistribution of Wealth in the Past Five Years

by Paul Buchheit
Published on Monday, December 30, 2013 by Common Dreams

Anyone reviewing the data is likely to conclude that there must be some mistake. It doesn't seem possible that one out of twenty American families could each have made a million dollars since Obama became President, while the average American family's net worth has barely recovered. But the evidence comes from numerous reputable sources.

Some conservatives continue to claim that President Obama is unfriendly to business, but the facts show that the richest Americans and the biggest businesses have been the main - perhaps only - beneficiaries of the massive wealth gain over the past five years.

1. $5 Million to Each of the 1%, and $1 Million to Each of the Next 4%

From the end of 2008 to the middle of 2013 total U.S. wealth increased from $47 trillion to $72 trillion. About $16 trillion of that is financial gain (stocks and other financial instruments).

The richest 1% own about 38 percent of stocks, and half of non-stock financial assets. So they've gained at least $6.1 trillion (38 percent of $16 trillion). That's over $5 million for each of 1.2 million households.

The next richest 4%, based on similar calculations, gained about $5.1 trillion. That's over a million dollars for each of their 4.8 million households.

The least wealthy 90% in our country own only 11 percent of all stocks excluding pensions (which are fast disappearing). The frantic recent surge in the stock market has largely bypassed these families.

2. Evidence of Our Growing Wealth Inequality

This first fact is nearly ungraspable: In 2009 the average wealth for almost half of American families was ZERO (their debt exceeded their assets).

In 1983 the families in America's poorer half owned an average of about $15,000. But from 1983 to 1989 median wealth fell from over $70,000 to about $60,000. From 1998 to 2009, fully 80% of American families LOST wealth. They had to borrow to stay afloat.

It seems the disparity couldn't get much worse, but after the recession it did. According to a Pew Research Center study, in the first two years of recovery the mean net worth of households in the upper 7% of the wealth distribution rose by an estimated 28%, while the mean net worth of households in the lower 93% dropped by 4%. And then, from 2011 to 2013, the stock market grew by almost 50 percent, with again the great majority of that gain going to the richest 5%.

Today our wealth gap is worse than that of the third world. Out of all developed and undeveloped countries with at least a quarter-million adults, the U.S. has the 4th-highest degree of wealth inequality in the world, trailing only Russia, Ukraine, and Lebanon.

3. Congress' Solution: Take from the Poor

Congress has responded by cutting unemployment benefits and food stamps, along with other 'sequester' targets like Meals on Wheels for seniors and Head Start for preschoolers. The more the super-rich make, the more they seem to believe in the cruel fantasy that the poor are to blame for their own struggles.

President Obama recently proclaimed that inequality "drives everything I do in this office." Indeed it may, but in the wrong direction.

FORUM HOSTS, PLEASE NOTE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Paul Buchheit is a college teacher, an active member of US Uncut Chicago, founder and developer of social justice and educational websites (UsAgainstGreed.org, PayUpNow.org, RappingHistory.org), and the editor and main author of "American Wars: Illusions and Realities" (Clarity Press). He can be reached at paul@UsAgainstGreed.org.

Original Article from two years back, almost: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/12/30-0

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Geithner and Summers FreakinDJ Sep 2015 #1
Geithner was never Wall Street. Summers wasn't cabinet Recursion Sep 2015 #2
BS. He now serves as president of Warburg Pincus, a Wall Street private equity firm Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #4
What, was Obama supposed to see into the future? Recursion Sep 2015 #9
Yes. I can. It shows how beholden he is to Wall Street. Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #21
Erm, all cabinet positions have lucrative post-job opportunities. joshcryer Sep 2015 #27
For sure, but Geithner is off the list too. Hortensis Sep 2015 #31
But you can agree that "to Wall Street" is different from "from Wall Street", right? (nt) Recursion Sep 2015 #35
Overly literal much? merrily Sep 2015 #6
What are you talking about? His only private sector job was CFR which is a think tank Recursion Sep 2015 #10
What part of "overly literal" is mystifying? merrily Sep 2015 #15
Which of those jobs are you possibly calling "Wall Street"? Recursion Sep 2015 #16
Again, what part of "overly literal" is mystifying to you? merrily Sep 2015 #18
Well what the hell does "Wall Street" mean to you, then? Recursion Sep 2015 #19
What part of "accuracy" is a problem ? treestar Sep 2015 #36
Kindly link me to an inaccurate statement I've made about Wall Street. Thanks. merrily Sep 2015 #41
It is the revolving door WITH Wall Street TM99 Sep 2015 #3
He thinks this shows us! LMAO. merrily Sep 2015 #7
No, give me an example Recursion Sep 2015 #11
You have been given examples. TM99 Sep 2015 #14
No, I haven't Recursion Sep 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily Sep 2015 #20
Jack Lew & Michael Froman. Holder didn't & doesn't work on Wall Street but his clients are there think Sep 2015 #30
Thank you; I had missed Lew Recursion Sep 2015 #32
Another dodge treestar Sep 2015 #37
Or you could just read my Post #3 TM99 Sep 2015 #39
In Japan it is called "Amakudari" Bonobo Sep 2015 #40
AG Loretta Lynch has worked both sides. nt Ilsa Sep 2015 #5
When? Recursion Sep 2015 #13
I read that one of her first clients at Hogan was Ilsa Sep 2015 #22
Does Penny Pritzker count? Octafish Sep 2015 #8
Does "Wall Street" just mean "Banking"? Recursion Sep 2015 #12
Of course, as Wall Street means vacuuming up the wealth created by workers. Octafish Sep 2015 #23
Of course in English as we use it, 'Wall St' means 'Banking and Finance' not the location Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #25
No, it doesn't mean "banking" to most people, it means "finance" Recursion Sep 2015 #26
So that's one person so far. joshcryer Sep 2015 #29
Lew was at Citi; that's pretty uncontroversially "Wall Street" Recursion Sep 2015 #34
nice try my friend. mopinko Sep 2015 #24
Rec. joshcryer Sep 2015 #28
K&R! stonecutter357 Sep 2015 #33
good one treestar Sep 2015 #38
So some of the most recognizable neoliberals in the nation connected to Rubin mmonk Sep 2015 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which of Obama's cabinet ...»Reply #23