General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NRA News [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)ran ads against Democrats. If Republicans advocated similar gun control policies, the RNA would run against them as well. The RNA and the Republican Party are often allies because our Party practically pushed them together. If you examine the history of the NRA and Democratic positions on gun control, you'll realize that this certainly wasn't always the case.
However, even if the NRA is "a right wing organization dominated by greedy, racist, warmongering right-wing leadership that reflects their members," that alone does not make them hypocrites, Rex's allegation that he (and you) have yet to substantiate. Again, words actually have meaning and definition.
The NRA advocates exposing children to firearms and providing age-appropriate instruction and training to improve both individual and public safety. You certainly may (and apparently do) believe this is a bad idea or worse. However, by all indications, the leadership and much of the membership of the NRA do indeed expose their own children to firearms and provide ample training, sport and hunting opportunities. Accordingly, the NRA seems to clearly practice what they preach and are not hypocrites on this issue.
Do gun controllers so lack legitimate and supportable criticims of NRA (and general gun rights) policy beliefs that they're forced to resort to little more than personal insults, accusations of partisanship, strawman arguments, and actually redefining the English language, in order to compete?
Do you and others have so few substantive and persuasive ideas to offer in opposition to NRA beliefs concerning childhood firearms safety and training, such as their Eddie Eagle program, that vague and unsupported claims of "hypocrisy" are the best you can muster?
It's no wonder ever increasing numbers of Americans support gun rights and oppose restrictions, and gun laws are generally liberalizing across the nations all while crime rates have substantially dropped.