Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
17. Here you go.
Wed May 23, 2012, 08:17 PM
May 2012

Social Security will run out of funds, and trust fund borrowed assets, in 2020. After then, it will have to start selling its assets, and will run out of those 2033. After then, tax income will be insufficient to pay the benefits. It's a combination of the tax cuts in recent years, a flood of baby boomers aging, and not enough younger workers paying payroll taxes.

"Social Security

Social Security’s expenditures exceeded non-interest income in 2010 and 2011, the first such occurrences since 1983, and the Trustees estimate that these expenditures will remain greater than non-interest income throughout the 75-year projection period. The deficit of non-interest income relative to expenditures was about $49 billion in 2010 and $45 billion in 2011, and the Trustees project that it will average about $66 billion between 2012 and 2018 before rising steeply as the economy slows after the recovery is complete and the number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than the number of covered workers. Redemption of trust fund assets from the General Fund of the Treasury will provide the resources needed to offset the annual cash-flow deficits. Since these redemptions will be less than interest earnings through 2020, nominal trust fund balances will continue to grow. The trust fund ratio, which indicates the number of years of program cost that could be financed solely with current trust fund reserves, peaked in 2008, declined through 2011, and is expected to decline further in future years. After 2020, Treasury will redeem trust fund assets in amounts that exceed interest earnings until exhaustion of trust fund reserves in 2033, three years earlier than projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2086."

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/index.html



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bingo!!!!! Swede Atlanta May 2012 #1
Yes. Great statement, but I do want to clarify that those waiting for Medicare eligibility are, JDPriestly May 2012 #8
Most of our folks retire around 60 exboyfil May 2012 #2
The portion of people over 60 or 65 with arthritis, a history of back injuries, etc. is very high. JDPriestly May 2012 #6
we have a good friend who was forced to retire at age 62. He was a plumber for over 38 years CTyankee May 2012 #20
I tried to hire someone around 70 last year MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3
Have those 2 been with your company for a while? JDPriestly May 2012 #7
One about 6 years. The other I don't know how long. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #10
On the other hand...I know of a 70 year old still employed in a corporate office. RagAss May 2012 #4
Actually, they can touch him if he isn't working. But assuming your story is true, JDPriestly May 2012 #5
Of course they can "touch him" if he's not doing the work. Age is no protection for SharonAnn May 2012 #13
good question Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #9
Right - and the number of retirement aged people is just getting dana_b May 2012 #11
"They" say that there aren't enuf younger workers to fill the jobs in the future.` Honeycombe8 May 2012 #12
Please give a link to your source on Social Security running out of money in ten years. JDPriestly May 2012 #14
Here you go. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #17
In 2033, the youngest baby boomer will be 69 Major Nikon May 2012 #19
Soc Sec will start ridding itself of assets in 2020 to pay benefits. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #21
As it should Major Nikon May 2012 #22
social security is not paying things it was never set up for, like disability for younger people. HiPointDem May 2012 #15
Sorry, Grasshopper. You are unwise....and incorrect. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #16
I linked a social security administration page with the history of SS disability benefits -- which, HiPointDem May 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question we should ask th...»Reply #17