Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: if men got pregnant..... [View all]SunSeeker
(58,265 posts)65. Your sexist, clueless post was in the Men's Group. I don’t go there.
I was not "digging," I just spent 1 second clicking on your DU Journal to see what kind of posts you've made, to see if they could shed light on why you would make the rather out there suggestion that women are to blame for anti abortion terrorism. That is when I immediately saw this little gem you posted in the Men's Group, right there on the first screen:
I have yet to see one person on DU reasonably quantify how men are more advantaged than women
When asked, the standard answer is, 'men make 23%(actually 19.5%) more than women'. Naturally they don't want to hear that when relevant sociological factors are applied, the actually gender pay gap which could possibly be attributed to discrimination is statistically negligible. They also don't want to hear that men spend 29% more time working. Neither do they want to hear that men are disparately impacted by 14 of the 15 leading causes of death. So our 'advantage' is that we are wage slaves and get to die 5 years sooner.
When asked, the standard answer is, 'men make 23%(actually 19.5%) more than women'. Naturally they don't want to hear that when relevant sociological factors are applied, the actually gender pay gap which could possibly be attributed to discrimination is statistically negligible. They also don't want to hear that men spend 29% more time working. Neither do they want to hear that men are disparately impacted by 14 of the 15 leading causes of death. So our 'advantage' is that we are wage slaves and get to die 5 years sooner.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/~Major%20Nikon
Yes, it was pretty obvious why you blame women. You appear to think women have all the advantages.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, it's reflective of the fact 99.99999% of those who get pregnant are women
geek tragedy
Sep 2015
#4
If men could get pregnant, there would be no abortion "debate". n/m
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Sep 2015
#11
So you are claiming the terrorist actions of 3 men are altering public policy on this issue...
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#40
When the strawman and red herrings fail, I guess there's always lame character assassination
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#43
Majority Pro-choice (women) vs. Minority Pro-Choice (men) is not "negligable."
SunSeeker
Oct 2015
#70
No, untrue and unhelpful is suggesting all anti abortion activists are women.
SunSeeker
Oct 2015
#73
That some women are brainwashed into going against their own interests is undisputed. nt
SunSeeker
Oct 2015
#84
Might as well slap some sense into all forced-birthers, regardless of gender
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#25
The nature of organized religion is pretty much exclusively about controlling other's actions
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#37
Probably because you don't look at things through a moral authoritarian lens
Major Nikon
Sep 2015
#56
they would get extra sick time for their periods; childbirth would be a week inpatient,
Lil Missy
Sep 2015
#39