Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald: White House leaks for propaganda film [View all]Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)38. There is background to that...
And here is his response: (Oh the horror of the evolution of an informed citizen. THE HORROR. THE HORROR!)
The GOP fights itself on Illegal Immigration
GG note: This post was written in 2005, one month after I began blogging. It was recently dug up by some Obama cultists trying to discredit my criticisms of the President (to understand what I mean by "Obama cultists," see this 2006 post I wrote about Bush cultists: exactly the same mentality). As my subsequent writing reflects over the next many years, this post does not remotely reflect my views on immigration. My response to someone who recently asked about it is here:
That was a 6 yrs ago: 3 weeks after I began blogging, when I had zero readers. I've discussed many times before how there were many uninformed things I believed back then, before I focused on politics full-time - due to uncritically ingesting conventional wisdom, propaganda, etc. I've written many times since then about how immigrants are exploited by the Right for fear-mongering purposes. I'm 100% in favor of amnesty, think defeat of the DREAM Act was an act of evil, etc. That said, I do think illegal immigration is a serious problem: having millions of people live without legal rights; having a legal scheme that is so pervasively disregarded breeds contempt for the rule of law; virtually every country - not just the U.S. insists on border control because having a manageable immigration process is vital on multiple levels. But that post is something I wrote literally a few weeks after I began blogging when nobody was reading my blog; it was anything but thoughtful, contemplative, and informed, and - like so many things I thought were true then - has nothing to do with what I believe now.
GG note: This post was written in 2005, one month after I began blogging. It was recently dug up by some Obama cultists trying to discredit my criticisms of the President (to understand what I mean by "Obama cultists," see this 2006 post I wrote about Bush cultists: exactly the same mentality). As my subsequent writing reflects over the next many years, this post does not remotely reflect my views on immigration. My response to someone who recently asked about it is here:
That was a 6 yrs ago: 3 weeks after I began blogging, when I had zero readers. I've discussed many times before how there were many uninformed things I believed back then, before I focused on politics full-time - due to uncritically ingesting conventional wisdom, propaganda, etc. I've written many times since then about how immigrants are exploited by the Right for fear-mongering purposes. I'm 100% in favor of amnesty, think defeat of the DREAM Act was an act of evil, etc. That said, I do think illegal immigration is a serious problem: having millions of people live without legal rights; having a legal scheme that is so pervasively disregarded breeds contempt for the rule of law; virtually every country - not just the U.S. insists on border control because having a manageable immigration process is vital on multiple levels. But that post is something I wrote literally a few weeks after I began blogging when nobody was reading my blog; it was anything but thoughtful, contemplative, and informed, and - like so many things I thought were true then - has nothing to do with what I believe now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You did not grasp the point of the article at all. It is about the CIA and DoD leaking
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#24
Nah, he's always been a nasty little libertarian shit, as quick to whine about
struggle4progress
May 2012
#10
Glenn must be upset that Gary Johnson's bid to be president elicited *zero* response.
Ikonoklast
May 2012
#21
Yep. And if these whistleblowers had been procecuted under the Espionage Act by the Bush Admin
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#23
This administration has taken Bush's hypocritical take on gov't secrecy to new depths.
DirkGently
May 2012
#7
+2. Thank You. GG is a full fledged racist defending asshat, which I hear makes one a Libertarian.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2012
#26
Greenwald and anti-Obama, brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department...nt
SidDithers
May 2012
#31
Hehehe! Nice how you pretend that Greenwald is asserting "investigation" when he clearly
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#30
The Department of Justice (based on the figures in the United States Attorneys’ Annual Statistical
struggle4progress
May 2012
#32
I apologize. Obama's appointee Holder is totally ignorant of these ESPIONAGE cases...
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#34
Perhaps reading Greenwald has affected your ability to reason carefully
struggle4progress
May 2012
#39
So explain it to me carefully. Bush Admin investigates. Obama Admin prosecutes...
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#43
Greenwald has good points sometimes but this is just stupid, really really stupid.
Mr.Turnip
May 2012
#40