Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
38. There is background to that...
Wed May 23, 2012, 10:11 PM
May 2012

And here is his response: (Oh the horror of the evolution of an informed citizen. THE HORROR. THE HORROR!)

The GOP fights itself on Illegal Immigration

GG note: This post was written in 2005, one month after I began blogging. It was recently dug up by some Obama cultists trying to discredit my criticisms of the President (to understand what I mean by "Obama cultists," see this 2006 post I wrote about Bush cultists: exactly the same mentality). As my subsequent writing reflects over the next many years, this post does not remotely reflect my views on immigration. My response to someone who recently asked about it is here:

That was a 6 yrs ago: 3 weeks after I began blogging, when I had zero readers. I've discussed many times before how there were many uninformed things I believed back then, before I focused on politics full-time - due to uncritically ingesting conventional wisdom, propaganda, etc. I've written many times since then about how immigrants are exploited by the Right for fear-mongering purposes. I'm 100% in favor of amnesty, think defeat of the DREAM Act was an act of evil, etc. That said, I do think illegal immigration is a serious problem: having millions of people live without legal rights; having a legal scheme that is so pervasively disregarded breeds contempt for the rule of law; virtually every country - not just the U.S. insists on border control because having a manageable immigration process is vital on multiple levels. But that post is something I wrote literally a few weeks after I began blogging when nobody was reading my blog; it was anything but thoughtful, contemplative, and informed, and - like so many things I thought were true then - has nothing to do with what I believe now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looking forward to seeing it. The Hurt Locker was amazing. FarLeftFist May 2012 #1
October is the traditional -- Hell Hath No Fury May 2012 #2
Actually I think late December is the season for Oscar bait RZM May 2012 #41
Fall starts the Oscar chase -- Hell Hath No Fury May 2012 #44
Thanks for including the links! Luminous Animal May 2012 #3
yes it was mentioned and rightly ridiculed by Martin Bashir OKNancy May 2012 #19
Did Martin Bashir do any reporting on the documents? Luminous Animal May 2012 #20
He scoffed... said something like " it's a MOVIE! get real people" OKNancy May 2012 #22
You did not grasp the point of the article at all. It is about the CIA and DoD leaking Luminous Animal May 2012 #24
Thanks. Scurrilous May 2012 #4
Yet another shrill Greenwald tantrum struggle4progress May 2012 #5
It's amazing how much more "manly" he was during the Bush Admin. Luminous Animal May 2012 #6
Nah, he's always been a nasty little libertarian shit, as quick to whine about struggle4progress May 2012 #10
Hahahahaha!!! Luminous Animal May 2012 #15
Glenn must be upset that Gary Johnson's bid to be president elicited *zero* response. Ikonoklast May 2012 #21
Unsupported allegations? You can read the documents here: Luminous Animal May 2012 #25
He throws the 'whistleblower' term around rather loosely. Ikonoklast May 2012 #9
Whistleblowers existed long before official legal processes. Luminous Animal May 2012 #13
There is a legal process to follow. Ikonoklast May 2012 #18
Yep. And if these whistleblowers had been procecuted under the Espionage Act by the Bush Admin Luminous Animal May 2012 #23
This administration has taken Bush's hypocritical take on gov't secrecy to new depths. DirkGently May 2012 #7
Speaking of "propaganda" ProSense May 2012 #8
+ struggle4progress May 2012 #11
As usual, address the messenger. Ignore the message... Luminous Animal May 2012 #12
Not only do the apologies flow for the extension of Bush-era policies... villager May 2012 #14
+2. Thank You. GG is a full fledged racist defending asshat, which I hear makes one a Libertarian. Tarheel_Dem May 2012 #26
A-a-a-a-men! Luminous Animal May 2012 #27
Oh, now Greenwald's a "racist" brentspeak May 2012 #35
There is background to that... Luminous Animal May 2012 #38
Well, since Obama does the bidding of the Right Wing US Chamber of Commerce brentspeak May 2012 #37
Well now you've done it. Greenwald and an "anti" Obama piece. Autumn May 2012 #16
Greenwald and anti-Obama, brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department...nt SidDithers May 2012 #31
Ahh Sid. Redundancy Department says... Autumn May 2012 #33
Well played brentspeak May 2012 #36
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #17
Let's look at some of Greenwald's tiresome BS struggle4progress May 2012 #28
Hehehe! Nice how you pretend that Greenwald is asserting "investigation" when he clearly Luminous Animal May 2012 #30
The Department of Justice (based on the figures in the United States Attorneys’ Annual Statistical struggle4progress May 2012 #32
I apologize. Obama's appointee Holder is totally ignorant of these ESPIONAGE cases... Luminous Animal May 2012 #34
Perhaps reading Greenwald has affected your ability to reason carefully struggle4progress May 2012 #39
So explain it to me carefully. Bush Admin investigates. Obama Admin prosecutes... Luminous Animal May 2012 #43
Du Rec. nt woo me with science May 2012 #29
Greenwald has good points sometimes but this is just stupid, really really stupid. Mr.Turnip May 2012 #40
Apparently the mourning period for BBI is over n/t RZM May 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greenwald: White House le...»Reply #38