Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(23,946 posts)

2. Why is not wanting any further information only an issue when the mass murderer is a RW white guy?

Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:15 PM

Oct 2015

Illogical in the extreme.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let's pass a law banning any dissemination of the name, background, and motivation [View all] Dustlawyer Oct 2015 OP

Such a law would violate the First Amendment. Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #1

That's a HUUUUGE If. nt Xipe Totec Oct 2015 #10

What is the compelling government interest? onenote Oct 2015 #14

You'd censor the motives for such killings? onenote Oct 2015 #20

White guys like Cho, Nidal and Alexis? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #4

Where do you get the "only a white guy" part? Dustlawyer Oct 2015 #5

2 Yes to 14 No in your push poll..... Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #7

Let's not. nt Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #6

No. Way too easy to abuse. Shandris Oct 2015 #8

Sorry! Not only nope, but HELL NOPE! nt longship Oct 2015 #9

Utter Bullshit Special Prosciuto Oct 2015 #11

No absolutely not rbrnmw Oct 2015 #12

I agree, no law but a agreement that it causes more shootings. Nt Logical Oct 2015 #19