Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NutmegYankee

(16,454 posts)
1. I don't doubt that we would be better off if we did this
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 04:30 AM
Oct 2015

But I expect the cost to be far higher. There are additional costs to advertise and administer the program. Just the management of money and paperwork alone would be a significant expense. Also, in some categories the firearm value can exceed the turn in value, and per the 5th Amendment, the higher value would have to be given or the person can sue. I would expect many court cases since lawsuits are also a tool of opposition.

There would also be the enforcement problem. There will be a decent minority, at least 5%, who just refuse to comply. The legal costs to pursue, prosecute, and imprison could be astronomical.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A compulsory gun buyback ...»Reply #1