Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
7. Poppy Bush is why there are no Special Prosecutors around when you need one.
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 11:39 AM
Oct 2015


An example of what most Americans DON'T KNOW or if they did, apparently, give two figs about:

From Project Censored 1993:

5. IRAQGATE AND THE SILENT DEATH OF THE WATERGATE LAW

EXCERPT...

As the year 1992 drew to a close, the media seemed unconcerned with the Bush administration's covert, as well as overt, attempts to kill the Iraggate investigation. These also involved the demise of the Watergate Law, which had assured independent investigations of criminal acts by top officials. The law, which provided for appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate top level members of the administration, expired on December 15, 1992.

SOURCE: http://www.ringnebula.com/project-censored/1993/1993-story5.htm



How many people do you know who know what "Iraq-gate" is?

For DUers and the interested, the late William Safire detailed how: Poppy Bush helped arm Saddam's Iraq



Get it while you can, Compay Raoulito. I've noticed a lot of this history is disappearing from the DU servers and the rest of the Web, likely the result of how everything like the Bill of Rights changed after September 11. Once those of us who know it are gone, it is highly unlikely Corporate McPravda and LAckademia will cover such inconvenient realities for future generations. They'll just live it, without knowing what hell they're in.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wikileaks vs. the Empire:...»Reply #7