Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
61. Legally and functionally there's a big difference between automatic and semi-automatic firearms.
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 09:52 PM
Oct 2015

You can't just wave away the important distinctions because you personally abhor all guns and gun owners and don't care.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is a pesky thing called the 2nd Amendment. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #1
Lol, ok, how do you determine that? Nt Logical Oct 2015 #3
The same way we determine people aren't robbers and rapists. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #27
We wait LynnTTT Oct 2015 #77
We wait Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #80
... Major Nikon Oct 2015 #75
Also stomping all over the 4th during that confiscation... TipTok Oct 2015 #14
Don't forget about the Fifth (compensation) and Fourteenth (due process). nt branford Oct 2015 #53
I'm not sure that controllers TeddyR Oct 2015 #60
I had a realization earlier... TipTok Oct 2015 #71
No If it became illegal, probable cause would exist. treestar Oct 2015 #85
That is just creepy... TipTok Oct 2015 #98
Wow, not put much thought into this i assume. Nt Logical Oct 2015 #2
Send guys with guns to confiscate all guns. Throd Oct 2015 #4
I see a future in giant C-arms ileus Oct 2015 #54
Consider the logistics and probability of that happening. NightWatcher Oct 2015 #5
It is really loose talk like that kills any chance at meaningful gun control. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #9
+ 1 Billion!! lancer78 Oct 2015 #39
Considering her history her thoughts were understandable but they aren't helpful. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #48
Except hers of course... TipTok Oct 2015 #99
I'm wondering if the OP actually belongs here or is stirring up shit. n/t X_Digger Oct 2015 #45
Yep, could be. n/t RKP5637 Oct 2015 #56
+1 DashOneBravo Oct 2015 #83
Works for me. ananda Oct 2015 #6
Automatic weapons were restricted in 1986 Travis_0004 Oct 2015 #30
The restrictions started in 1934 with the passage of the NFA. nt branford Oct 2015 #55
We know what poster meant by "auto." The gun nomenclature game is tiring. Hoyt Oct 2015 #57
Legally and functionally there's a big difference between automatic and semi-automatic firearms. branford Oct 2015 #61
Take it up with Colt. In the meantime, i'm sure your gun clients appreciate Hoyt Oct 2015 #62
My practice doesn't involve firearms and related law. branford Oct 2015 #65
OK, you defend Zimmermans too. Little difference. Hoyt Oct 2015 #68
No, my opinion of Zimmerman is quite poor. branford Oct 2015 #70
And further measures HassleCat Oct 2015 #7
Sorry, this type of reasoning - too extremes packman Oct 2015 #25
Speaking of extreme HassleCat Oct 2015 #28
"Wildly unconstitutional" packman Oct 2015 #33
Unless you believe the Constitution is "Just a God-damned piece of paper" NutmegYankee Oct 2015 #37
Don't interpret my posts with the statements of an idiot packman Oct 2015 #40
Unless being a member of the ACLU is considered extremist... NutmegYankee Oct 2015 #42
Exactly how many times TeddyR Oct 2015 #51
And your point? packman Oct 2015 #69
And speaking of... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #82
No. jwirr Oct 2015 #8
Confiscation won't remove all the guns from civilian hands. Taitertots Oct 2015 #10
Quite true, and all it would do is create a lucrative black market. n/t RKP5637 Oct 2015 #58
Been there done that... LeftyChristian Oct 2015 #11
LOL you get that from NRA talking points? chalmers Oct 2015 #13
Do you dispute these assertions? philosslayer Oct 2015 #21
After a little research treestar Oct 2015 #88
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. LeftyChristian Oct 2015 #22
LOL, did you get that from the Brady Bunch org. talking points? GGJohn Oct 2015 #66
Jesus, why are you even posting on the DU? packman Oct 2015 #34
Absolute Solution LeftyChristian Oct 2015 #43
Except nazi germany actually expanded gun rights. Of course they restricted the jews and MillennialDem Oct 2015 #36
Not my list LeftyChristian Oct 2015 #46
Eyeroll: from wiki MillennialDem Oct 2015 #50
What is your point? LeftyChristian Oct 2015 #95
False dichotomy. You can fight without a gun and you can be taken captive even with one. And MillennialDem Oct 2015 #96
Exactly, we have an Equal Protection Clause treestar Oct 2015 #87
Who was exterminated in Australia? treestar Oct 2015 #86
And this is the guy to do it sarisataka Oct 2015 #12
We'll call this "Project: Prison Population Explosion." Dr. Strange Oct 2015 #15
Also likely to be called Police Reduction Program dumbcat Oct 2015 #32
It's hard to have a real rational discussion on this topic... NutmegYankee Oct 2015 #38
Good luck with that. There is that pesky little thing The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2015 #16
Enforce the 2nd Amendment! Like the NRA says, just enforce the laws we have! flamin lib Oct 2015 #17
Within the week JackInGreen Oct 2015 #79
Notice these pencil dick losers workinclasszero Oct 2015 #90
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H.L. Mencken nt Xipe Totec Oct 2015 #18
That would cause a civil war LittleBlue Oct 2015 #19
Maybe guns should be issued to everybody, including children, then at designated moment point the Lint Head Oct 2015 #20
Talk about giving the Alex Jones conspiracy wackos the ultimate Christmas present. Monk06 Oct 2015 #23
That's tyranny. Like the misinterpreted Second Amendment is tyranny on the majority of Americans. onehandle Oct 2015 #24
There's 200 million of them. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #26
Do you comprehend the results of that? WDIM Oct 2015 #29
There would be a mass ignoring of the law krispos42 Oct 2015 #59
This is not a good idea, Blue_In_AK Oct 2015 #31
And how, specifically, do you suggest they do that? Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #35
nope Angry Dragon Oct 2015 #41
The Federal government needs to ban all alcohol and drugs. pablo_marmol Oct 2015 #44
It worked in Australia librechik Oct 2015 #47
Australia did not ban guns. There are plenty of guns in Australia hack89 Oct 2015 #49
No one will ever die again. ileus Oct 2015 #52
What a moronic thread. GGJohn Oct 2015 #63
Not a deep thinker are you. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #64
Do you also propose to completely secure the borders? BOTH of them? cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #67
Yeah, who needs that pesky Constitution? ladyVet Oct 2015 #72
Earlier this week a different poster the Constitution was described as "yellowing parchment" Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #73
It's not credible that would be the result treestar Oct 2015 #89
Thanks for helping pro gun advocates like myself. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #74
It's only a matter of time before the roundup begins. cheapdate Oct 2015 #76
Yes chalmers JackInGreen Oct 2015 #78
I still think a license for each weapon is the way to go. LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #81
I have 4 vehicles but only one license. oneshooter Oct 2015 #92
That is the license I am talking about. Most people have different licenses for each vehicle. LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #94
Licenses are generally for public use, not for simple ownership. beevul Oct 2015 #97
I wish there was a way treestar Oct 2015 #84
This solution is exactly what the NRA is using to fight gun jwirr Oct 2015 #91
Federal government needs to confiscate all automobiles workinclasszero Oct 2015 #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Federal government ne...»Reply #61