General Discussion

LiberalArkie

(19,767 posts)

15. I have a feeling that Vatican security would never have let the pope be alone with

Sat Oct 3, 2015, 06:58 PM

Oct 2015

2 Americans. Maybe with some ISIS members, but 2 Americans, they would never risk it. Not in a confined area like a meeting room. Security was just a few feet away when he was speaking to congress. Totally insane. No photographers? When did you see the Pope anywhere that there wasn't Vatican photographers?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A red flag most of us missed in the Kim Davis fantasy. [View all] pnwmom Oct 2015 OP

Among the many sins according to her religion that she has and is still committing. hobbit709 Oct 2015 #1

Don't matter... ThoughtCriminal Oct 2015 #11

Most fundie christians... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2015 #39

A red flag only if you want to see one. Excellent point. leveymg Oct 2015 #2

Maybe he spoke in tongues? No, that's a different wacko philosophy. randome Oct 2015 #3

Kimmeh: He said "�gimus tibi gratias, omn�potens Deus, pro universis beneficiis tuis," Liberal Veteran Oct 2015 #7

Kim "Maggot" Davis NBachers Oct 2015 #4

Kick. hifiguy Oct 2015 #5

Yes, you are right dem in texas Oct 2015 #8

And I wouldn't think the pope MissDeeds Oct 2015 #14

Oh....SNAP! SoapBox Oct 2015 #19

I think she is viewed as an adulterer because she's deemed to still be married to the first spouse. spooky3 Oct 2015 #44

Only marriages within the Catholic church count. Ms. Toad Oct 2015 #62

thanks spooky3 Oct 2015 #63

Squirrel madamesilverspurs Oct 2015 #6

This one that turned up on DU a lot: hifiguy Oct 2015 #10

As bogus and manufactured a lie as the PP smear and EGazhi/BGazhi...by the same folks. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #9

Which statement? In the one on Friday, they talked about Vatican 'personnel' muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #12

/thread... SidDithers Oct 2015 #23

If only it were the end ... muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #37

I was referring to the original statement made by the lawyer on camera. pnwmom Oct 2015 #48

I was talking about the lawyers' on-camera statement, when he said there was no one else pnwmom Oct 2015 #47

He says 'Vatican staff' in that muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #52

None so blind....Nov. 20, 2014 Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #13

I have a feeling that Vatican security would never have let the pope be alone with LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #15

Clearly. Still In Wisconsin Oct 2015 #21

It also sets up a scenario that only the Davis's know what happened ToxMarz Oct 2015 #32

Wonder how that will fit in with all the F the Pope posts. Waldorf Oct 2015 #16

I always say fuck the pope... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2015 #41

The whole thing smelled to high heaven to me PatSeg Oct 2015 #17

As Popes go, historically speaking, wait and see. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2015 #28

I'm not Catholic PatSeg Oct 2015 #33

I was a catholic and I work for the catholics. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2015 #50

The history of the Catholic Church PatSeg Oct 2015 #59

A PBS series on the history of Popes would be quite educatiinal. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2015 #66

And the Pope's a Jesuit, perhaps the most liberal order within the Church. Beartracks Oct 2015 #61

I though the very same thing, pnwmom. Pope's English skills seem very difficult. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #18

BS! Helen Borg Oct 2015 #20

Your efforts at defending Pope Photo-Op are admirable... SidDithers Oct 2015 #22

And your efforts to demean religious DUers aren't. Octafish Oct 2015 #53

First they came for Pope Photo-Op... SidDithers Oct 2015 #56

Tell us, SidDithers of DU: Is Naomi Klein still a bit of a drinker? Octafish Oct 2015 #57

Promoting Pope Photo-Op fits right in with your history... SidDithers Oct 2015 #58

I knew she was lying rbrnmw Oct 2015 #24

She's on her fourth marriage now, but in her view the slate was wiped clean pnwmom Oct 2015 #46

Of course she thinks that rbrnmw Oct 2015 #55

That's a good point, but... Orrex Oct 2015 #25

As are any security people. Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #31

The lawyer specifically said that no one else was in the room besides photographers and pnwmom Oct 2015 #45

Is this the same lawyer... Orrex Oct 2015 #49

I don't know if it's that lawyer. But he IS the lawyer who put out a fraudulent photo pnwmom Oct 2015 #51

+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2015 #54

K & R malaise Oct 2015 #26

Excellent Observation KauaiK Oct 2015 #27

Lazy, lazy media lsewpershad Oct 2015 #29

why would the Pope concern onethatcares Oct 2015 #30

K & R!!! Thespian2 Oct 2015 #34

Maybe she met with him at that big rally for her in Peru and she just got confused. jalan48 Oct 2015 #35

Fiorina/Davis 2016 rbrnmw Oct 2015 #36

Perhaps they spoke in tongues... pig Latin would be most appropriate. Raster Oct 2015 #38

Well, if photographers were there... Tab Oct 2015 #40

Exactly. BarackTheVote Oct 2015 #60

What news media? MSM is not journalism. LuckyLib Oct 2015 #42

I am always amazed that some here think the M$M is in the business of news. Rex Oct 2015 #65

THAT MEETING tomm2thumbs Oct 2015 #43

Who you gonna believe? The head of a 2000 year old religion or some American bred fundie? Rex Oct 2015 #64