Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Dr. Strange

(26,058 posts)

23. Oh good.

Reply to jeff47 (Reply #13)

Mon Oct 5, 2015, 12:58 PM

Oct 2015

I'm so sick of finding DNA bits in my salt. Just give me a chemical-free salt, that's all I want.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GMO Propaganda and the Sociology of Science [View all] JohnyCanuck Oct 2015 OP

Evidently the author is counting on nobody following up on her examples Major Nikon Oct 2015 #1

Meanwhile your heroes have their hands full defending themselves from RICO violations GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #2

Question... Major Nikon Oct 2015 #4

Seralini can speak for himself. JohnyCanuck Oct 2015 #3

Sure, Seralini's "study" isn't junk science, just ask Seralini Major Nikon Oct 2015 #11

Yup. Anyone, and I mean any-fucking-one, defending Seralini... SidDithers Oct 2015 #9

"Upstream" scientists? "Downstream" scientists? How about 88% of ALL scientists... LAGC Oct 2015 #5

Your logical fallacy is: Association Fallacy. GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #8

WTF are you talking about? Major Nikon Oct 2015 #18

Science for the win! GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #20

Try again with a cite that actually supports your assertion and you might have something Major Nikon Oct 2015 #24

Oh noes! Pesticides!!1! progressoid Oct 2015 #29

Seralini! NuclearDem Oct 2015 #6

Agricultural experts were aware of the risks of weed resistance to glyphosate from the start. yellowcanine Oct 2015 #7

The results speak for themselves Major Nikon Oct 2015 #25

Yes, the lack of resistance has been quite remarkable. yellowcanine Oct 2015 #27

Why isn't the anti-GMO side demanding "GMO Free" labels? jeff47 Oct 2015 #10

Exactly... SidDithers Oct 2015 #12

Well, they definately need to set up some sort of standards jeff47 Oct 2015 #13

But, but then they would have to include/exclude things like cheese, and they don't want that!!! HuckleB Oct 2015 #15

Oh good. Dr. Strange Oct 2015 #23

Those labels are already everywhere. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #14

Yup. That helps me to avoid spending money on companies that utilize unethical marketing. HuckleB Oct 2015 #16

I do occasionally have to buy ingredients with those labels NuclearDem Oct 2015 #17

Yeah, that is a definite problem. HuckleB Oct 2015 #19

An even better question is why the anti-GMO side isn't demanding "Mutation breeding" labels Major Nikon Oct 2015 #21

+1,000,000 ... 000 HuckleB Oct 2015 #22

And the beat goes on... CanSocDem Oct 2015 #26

bring out the clowns SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #28

Facts are so stinky progressoid Oct 2015 #31

all we can make are tentative deductions SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #32

No, we can make quite certain deductions. progressoid Oct 2015 #33

you seem to have a problem with your thinking SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #34

the type of agricultural process fostered by GMO crops is not sustainable? progressoid Oct 2015 #35

I notice that you tend to the banal and avoid the essence while ignoring the complexity SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #36

So which are you espousing? progressoid Oct 2015 #37

"all we can make are tentative deductions" SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #38

"Perhaps 20% of the scientists in the Pew poll work directly or indirectly on GM technology" progressoid Oct 2015 #30