Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If I really have the right to bear arms-- [View all]Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)45. To answer your questions,
there are some limits to what arms can be held by civilians. However, if a person has the resources, there is not a law that would bar them from owning several hundred ir several thousand guns. As long as they are not engaging in gun trafficking, it is legal to own as many guns as such a person would want.
The first part of the 2A gives a reason, but is not a limiting clause. the BoR limits the government, not the people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Point Is Not Lost Here - The Gun Nuts Are Certifiably Crazy - Only Social Custom And Law Keeps
cantbeserious
Oct 2015
#3
Back in the 90's, probably...94 or 95 I'd say, I saw a long-haired man in a trenchcoat...
Shandris
Oct 2015
#20
There is actually a knife rights group. There are links in the Motherjones article to their website.
Waldorf
Oct 2015
#10
In the area of New York I live in there are lots of old cannons all over...
PoliticAverse
Oct 2015
#30
And why just firearms? Why not field artillery? Guided missles? Chemical weapons?
Mister Ed
Oct 2015
#17
I used to attend mass at a catholic church in New York City, occasionally the Knights of Columbus...
PoliticAverse
Oct 2015
#38