Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,031 posts)
7. The Republicans would actually be smart to publicly end the Benghazi investigation
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 12:04 PM
Oct 2015

giving a very straight forward summary of everything that did happen. (There really is nothing there -- and even from the beginning, the closest thing they could have hoped to have found was something that indicated that the administration, while admitting that the ambassador and three others were killed tried to minimize the political impact. However, that is what you would expect ANY administration to do two months before an election. In fact, the entire issue for the Republicans was that they thought it should have led to a Romney win -- but Romney's initial reaction was very tone deaf.)

They could then - in a very "take the high road", say that they will let the FBI and Justice Department lead on the investigation on the Clinton email processes, but continue to monitor those investigations. (Here, the fact is the FBI and JD are really the ones leading this effort.)

Why would this be a good idea for the Republicans? -- because there really is nothing there on Benghazi itself and - as she did this week, HRC wins when she defends herself from charges that she either did not care or was negligent here. It then allows them to place their focus on the email issues.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times Editorial ...»Reply #7