Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
9. yep since it is
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 12:49 PM
Oct 2015

intrastate that is how it should be handled. I also love how they say "internet" sales do not require a background check. I purchased 5 online and had to have them delivered to an FFL and complete a background check. Must have done it wrong?

Oh that's right same thing, intrastate sales are handled under state law and not federal law.

Put the lie out enough........

This passage also works for weapon sales

What is the difference between interstate commerce and intrastate commerce?

If you perform trade, traffic, or transportation exclusively in your business’s domicile state, this is considered intrastate commerce. If your trade, traffic, or transportation is between a place in a state and a place outside of such state (including a place outside of the United States); between two places in a state through another state or a place outside of the United States; or between two places in a state as part of trade, traffic, or transportation originating or terminating outside the state or the United States, this is considered interstate commerce. Source: 49 CFR 390.5.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the merchants of death have to keep their phony baloney jobs spanone Oct 2015 #1
The merchants of death seem to have quite a lot of support in that regard... villager Oct 2015 #2
Corporate McPravda and Flackadamia... Octafish Oct 2015 #8
I've read a few of those talking points on a certain progressive forum, as a matter of fact... Orrex Oct 2015 #3
Oh, the parrots are quite dutiful in their regurgitations... villager Oct 2015 #5
The solution to gun shows is simple hack89 Oct 2015 #4
But guns! Orrex Oct 2015 #6
If you shut down gun shows then you simply make policing gun sales harder hack89 Oct 2015 #7
We've basically been over this already Orrex Oct 2015 #15
So lets work together on UBCs hack89 Oct 2015 #16
Yes, let's work together on UBCs villager Oct 2015 #20
My state has had them for a while now hack89 Oct 2015 #21
Do you make this known publicly in forums *with* your fellow gun owners? villager Oct 2015 #25
DU is the only place I regularly post about guns hack89 Oct 2015 #26
Well, you need to start working on your fellow pro-gunners, I suspect villager Oct 2015 #27
All the gun owners I know well live in New England hack89 Oct 2015 #28
Well no, you can keep posting here on generally pro gun control sites villager Oct 2015 #29
It is not that big a deal to us hack89 Oct 2015 #30
It's a big deal to some of us -- and public gun owner support would have an an outsize impact villager Oct 2015 #31
That's nice nt hack89 Oct 2015 #32
Favorite group Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #33
Ok. Orrex Oct 2015 #22
yep since it is Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #9
As we discussed in the gungeon sarisataka Oct 2015 #10
Personally, I am for restricting concealed carrry permits to trained professionals Maedhros Oct 2015 #12
I'm afraid that cat sarisataka Oct 2015 #23
I just don't trust people to pack weapons with them 24-7. Maedhros Oct 2015 #24
I look forward, then, to the networking and lobbying you'll be undertaking with fellow gun owners villager Oct 2015 #19
There no longer is an NRA. Archae Oct 2015 #11
I assume your accompanying image is meant ironically, Archae, but I wouldn't be surprised villager Oct 2015 #14
According to a few conservatives, Jesus would want more guns Archae Oct 2015 #17
You can't be the Prince of Peace unless you come strapped! villager Oct 2015 #18
Bookmarked underpants Oct 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Indefensible Tweets Fro...»Reply #9