Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

CK_John

(10,005 posts) Thu May 24, 2012, 02:45 PM May 2012

With only 20yr of commercial oil left, does it matter who the next 2 Presidents are? [View all]

Of course none of the candidates will tell us what they plan on doing about it.

Of course some will want to quibble over the number of yrs left, but everyone who can add 2 and 2 knows that India and China will need 75% of existing oil sources to maintain its growth rate and both are a lot closer to the Saudi oil fields than we are.

If you want links, forgetaboutit! No FOIA is going to give you a time-line.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

With only 20yr of commercial oil left, does it matter who the next 2 Presidents are? [View all] CK_John May 2012 OP

I believe it does matter, there is still enough oil in the ground to Uncle Joe May 2012 #1

There's not enough oil in the ground that can be extracted economically FarCenter May 2012 #8

Actually I don't believe we have to drill, pump and burn all of it to reach the premise of my post Uncle Joe May 2012 #9

Regardless of who is elected... Speck Tater May 2012 #2

So little time to change the world. nt CK_John May 2012 #3

If you think we are doomed then why arn't you jumping off a bridge? Odin2005 May 2012 #4

I'm not jumping off the bridge because I'm watching the show. Speck Tater May 2012 #5

Whats a Doomer? n/t Strelnikov_ May 2012 #7

Yes... because one party (Democrats) is interested in expanding other sources of energy scheming daemons May 2012 #6