Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)

24. LOL! You just linked to some local agency in the state of California. Nice try.

Reply to Major Nikon (Reply #21)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 07:15 PM

Oct 2015

Not the same.

I know someone whose job it was to Lobby Congress regarding Organic standards, although your obvious bias makes it seem unlikely you care about facts regarding this topic.

here are some relevant links:

http://consumersunion.org/news/u-s-department-of-agriculture-guts-national-organic-law/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070203365.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"No GMO" is now officially an advertising gimmick... [View all] Archae Oct 2015 OP

GMO free salt jeff47 Oct 2015 #1

I like the first comment at that listing... Archae Oct 2015 #3

That is pretty funny, thank you. uppityperson Oct 2015 #6

Mmmm...2 pounds of Himalayan pink! Rex Oct 2015 #23

Wouldn't "It -becomes- an advertising gimmick" be more accurate? Shandris Oct 2015 #2

It's always been a gimmick Major Nikon Oct 2015 #4

Organic farmers fought, lobbied for and LOST the ability to define "organic" standards KittyWampus Oct 2015 #13

Bingo. The only difference between organic and non-organic is the price. Archae Oct 2015 #14

Oh, bullshit. You are wrong. There are organic farmers. I've listed the benefits of organic farming KittyWampus Oct 2015 #19

Rubbish Major Nikon Oct 2015 #21

LOL! You just linked to some local agency in the state of California. Nice try. KittyWampus Oct 2015 #24

So you actually think organic labels "came about" in 2009? Major Nikon Oct 2015 #25

yes, and it is tiresome Skittles Oct 2015 #29

All the more reason to learn to cook swilton Oct 2015 #5

Non-GMO and organic are two different things. GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #7

"Many?" Archae Oct 2015 #8

Well I for one insist that my fillet-o-fish be organic, non-GMO, and gluten-free. Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #11

Yes. That's why the pressure is on to create an official "Contains GMOs" label. jeff47 Oct 2015 #10

Was this an "advertising gimmick"? nationalize the fed Oct 2015 #9

Which is why we need labeling of GMO ingredients, so people can make informed pnwmom Oct 2015 #12

whose definition of "GMO ingredients"? alp227 Oct 2015 #15

No, and not corrupt food processors either, like Monsanto. By the FDA's definition. n/t pnwmom Oct 2015 #22

Monsanto isn't a "food processor" Major Nikon Oct 2015 #27

Why not a "GMO Free" label? jeff47 Oct 2015 #28

The OP says such a label would be an advertising gimmick. pnwmom Oct 2015 #30

A label with no certification process certainly is. jeff47 Oct 2015 #31

Glyphosphate must be absorbed by the plant in order to work. pnwmom Oct 2015 #32

Seeing "No GMO" advertised can be a good thing, I think. dixiegrrrrl Oct 2015 #16

Propaganda tends to do that. Archae Oct 2015 #18

Wait, did the "Advertising Gimmick Council" *officially* label it? alcibiades_mystery Oct 2015 #17

You tell me. Archae Oct 2015 #20

Unrec. Nt. darkangel218 Oct 2015 #26

Have you seen the "gluten free" 100% fruit juices? hobbit709 Oct 2015 #33