Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TlalocW

(15,674 posts)
8. I'm all for decriminalization, help for addicts, etc. Where just this piece loses me is in the URL
Thu May 24, 2012, 05:04 PM
May 2012

It's not a disease. I've lost loved ones to various diseases. There is a scientific definition to a disease, and addiction doesn't fall under it. I'm not a big fan of 12-Step programs like AA (which is not scientific and has a horrible success rate to begin with), but I think part of an addict getting over it is to admit they had a lot of say in his or her addiction. Unless, you're purposely trying to catch malaria by traveling to marshes while wearing Eau de Mosquito, a person really doesn't have a lot of blame when it comes to getting a disease. Scientific purity is already blurring over the whole, "Evolution is just a theory," soundbite creationists use because the general public equates theory with guess. Let's not slide on this one. Addiction is a huge enough problem that needs to be met head on with whatever methods can cure it that it doesn't need to seep over into any other category, including disease.

TlalocW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACLU: Treating Addiction ...»Reply #8