Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The nightmare of Reagan and the useful idiots who voted for him is still with us [View all]
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/05/24/150067/lockheed-to-hire-temporary-workers.htmlLockheed to hire temporary workers to fill in for strikers
Posted on Thursday, May 24, 2012Modified Thursday, May 24, 2012
By BOB COX | McClatchy Newspapers
FORT WORTH, Texas Lockheed Martin on Thursday turned up the pressure on striking Machinists union members, announcing it would begin hiring temporary replacement workers to fill aircraft production jobs.
A handful of workers were being brought in from a temporary employment service and a few dozen more would be added next week, Lockheed spokesman Joe Stout said.
"We will add people incrementally each week as we need to," Stout said, with the goal of improving and boosting production until the Machinists return to work.
The action by Lockheed to begin augmenting its production workforce comes as the strike by about 3,600 members of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers is in its fifth week.
----------------------------------------------
Replacement Workers: Management's Big Gun
By PETER T. KILBORN, Special to The New York Times
Published: March 13, 1990
<snip>One reason that companies now think that goal is possible is the lesson they drew from the illegal strike of 11,500 Federal air traffic controllers in August 1981, seven months into Ronald Reagan's first term as President. After the controllers defied a back-to-work order, Mr. Reagan dismissed them, filled their ranks with permanent replacements, and the union collapsed.
'A Signal to Other Employers'
The Government's success in keeping the air traffic system working impressed many unionized companies.''Reagan made it respectable to bust unions,'' Mr. Baptiste said.
Gary Burtless, a labor economist at the Brookings Institution, said Mr. Reagan emboldened management to risk the strain to its business of taking on less experienced workers. ''The fact that the President was able to keep the air traffic system going indicated that there was a lot more scope for replacing workers than people imagined,'' Mr. Burtless said. ''If you can replace air traffic controllers you can certainly replace bus drivers.''
The permanent replacements, often recruited from the ranks of the unemployed or from low-paid employees of other businesses, are a variation on the temporary substitutes vilified by trade unionists as ''scabs'' or ''strikebreakers'' but nevertheless regarded as a part of management's legitimate arsenal. Temporary replacements leave at the end of a strike, but permanent replacements are assured the strikers' jobs. After a strike, the law allows strikers first claim on their old jobs, but only if replacements vacate them.
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The nightmare of Reagan and the useful idiots who voted for him is still with us [View all]
NNN0LHI
May 2012
OP
"Reagan Democrats" have made the lives of their children and grandchildren so much worse. Like
libinnyandia
May 2012
#1
Reagan did receive 26% of the Democratic vote in 1980 but he also received 54% of Independents
NNN0LHI
May 2012
#3
The Democrats forgot what the GOP stood for and unfortunately independents often vote with no
libinnyandia
May 2012
#4
Let us not forget also the spinelessness of the AFL-CIO and its head
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#6
George Meany couldn't have called a general strike to counter Reagan's union busting
NNN0LHI
May 2012
#7
Ouch, my memories have grown rusty with age. I thought I remembered
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#10