Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pork or nothing: how school dinners are dividing France [View all]yellowcanine
(36,792 posts)57. Actually - no. "Closer to rare" yes, but not rare.
145 degrees, to be exact. That is not rare. It is medium rare.
http://twentytwowords.com/pork-can-be-pink-the-usda-says-its-now-safe-to-eat-pork-closer-to-rare/
http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/articles/meat-and-poultry-temperature-guide.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is one reason I do not care for France. As a vegan, it was very difficult to eat in Paris.
emsimon33
Oct 2015
#181
I believe local school districts are still free to make whatever accommodations they want
Major Nikon
Oct 2015
#4
There are reasons other than religion why people don't eat pork or any meat at all
SpartanDem
Oct 2015
#8
Right. They also don't give special meals to Catholics who observe meatless Fridays.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#14
Hell, when I was in school, every Friday we got fish. Because Catholics.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2015
#41
I assume you grew up in the US, not France. Their Constitution doesn't have the same
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#70
Many kids from India are vegetarians for religious reasons, so pork is off their list, too. nt
tblue37
Oct 2015
#144
Theirs is a country with a constitution that has a much stronger wall between church and state
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#71
Does the French constitution demand that Muslim students be served pork?
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2015
#97
Peanut butter? In a school? The children will be accused of terrorism when a hazmat team
hughee99
Oct 2015
#28
That's "only in America." They're learning that it's the hysterical attitudes of American parents
MADem
Oct 2015
#61
I disagree. People have different food preferences and civilized societies respect them.
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#65
You aren't the French government, or the mayor of the towns implementing this, so
MADem
Oct 2015
#69
No but I am a human being and this is a question of human rights. So yes, my opinion matters.
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#80
You're right. I'm not the right-wing xenophobe nationalist mayor of that town.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2015
#98
France has a very strong wall between the State and Religion. This isn't an attack on Muslims.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#72
The French eat three times as much pork as Americans do. It is a staple meat in France.
MADem
Oct 2015
#129
NO ONE can enjoy wine with their public meal in Saudi Arabia, the French or anyone else.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#73
"public meal" - now you are qualifying it in a way which it was not qualified before.
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#78
I think you'd get an argument from most of the world, there--we're one of the few that does NOT have
MADem
Oct 2015
#125
Or the schools could quit being bigots and accommodate minor religious differences in food choices.
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#48
And they could accommodate the "minor religious difference" of public prayer before
MADem
Oct 2015
#179
The Muslims will be in the same position as Catholics who choose to observe meatless Fridays.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#13
They shouldn't accommodate religion; they should accommodate non-meat eaters.
Arugula Latte
Oct 2015
#16
Back then (and for may centuries after), trichinosis was a deadly threat.
Lizzie Poppet
Oct 2015
#29
But that no longer holds true in the modern world, so there is really no religious reason not to eat
smirkymonkey
Oct 2015
#33
There's really no reason to buy any of this religious nonsense in the modern world.
Arugula Latte
Oct 2015
#39
However, the reason no longer exists. It may have made sense in ancient times,
smirkymonkey
Oct 2015
#148
Disagree, they are standing up against the right wingers and other religious fundies
pediatricmedic
Oct 2015
#130
So because some "Muslim men" are intolerant ok to take it out on Muslim children?
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#52
No, because there seems to be considerable misunderstanding about the place of religious values
Marr
Oct 2015
#62
There is a difference between IMPOSING religious values and ACCOMMODATING them.
yellowcanine
Oct 2015
#68
No. Because France has a sturdy wall between the state and religion -- ANY religion.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#106
Ultimately, religion needs to go away - we shouldn't be tolerant of intolerance
frizzled
Oct 2015
#127
It's genuinely nice to hear from principled liberals who don't have double standards for religions
frizzled
Oct 2015
#126
Some on the far left hate anything "West", so be it politics, putin, or poor fundies in Syria
snooper2
Oct 2015
#147
If dog meat were a common part of the French diet, that would be one thing
riderinthestorm
Oct 2015
#119
It is a staple meat in French cuisine. It is not "ridiculous" if you understand anything about the
MADem
Oct 2015
#128
You probably don't understand that this concept was operative during the French colonial years.
MADem
Oct 2015
#164
France has a long history of a very high, strong wall between Church and State.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#139
How sad that so many DUers are supporting France's religious right in warping laïcité ...
Bad Thoughts
Oct 2015
#169