Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(8,663 posts)
16. i agree with your premise
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

However I suspect your numbers are off. I too am in the 28 % tax bracket (we make around 160K combined which just puts us above the 151K threshold for the 28% bracket). However, my effective tax rate is closer to 19%. Remember, you only pay the percentage in each bracket that is filled up. So, if you just make it to 28 % tax bracket, its only going to affect whats over that threshold.

Regarding the post you were replying to, this man is in thhe highest bracket (39.6%) and mainly paid in salary or such. The very rich have most of their income in investments which are taxed at 15% hence the low taxes..

source:

http://www.irs.com/articles/2014-federal-tax-rates-personal-exemptions-and-standard-deductions


So, from the link above $700,000 would make him pay:

$127962.50 + 39.6*(700000-457601)/100=195834 or so close to the 200K as stated in the post above with an effective 28% tax rate.


For your case of 200K, that would be 28925+0.28*(200000-148850)=43K or around 21% effective tax and thats with standard deductions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Republican Civil War....»Reply #16