Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CNN: This is how the NRA loses [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)38. Rifles of any kind aren't the problem, per the FBI:
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/table-20
So what is it that you want to accomplish?
So what is it that you want to accomplish?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unintended comedy alert. The American public came to its senses, seeing you couldn't ban something
LittleBlue
Oct 2015
#2
I realize that misdirection and conflation are on your faxed sheet of talking points
villager
Oct 2015
#7
People are neither physically dependent on guns, nor can they manufacture them in a bathtub
frizzled
Oct 2015
#19
Guns can be homemade fairly easily, as any Australian bikie or Afghan peasant can tell you
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#23
Ah yes, we forgot about those "homemade mass killings" that have happened in Australia
villager
Oct 2015
#25
What do you propose to do about the 300 million extant guns in the US?
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#29
It seems irrational to purposefully conflate regulation with banning and prohibition.
LanternWaste
Oct 2015
#44
It was legal to make up to 200 gallons a year of your own wine during Prohibition
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#64
Having to DIY a zip gun is an acceptable barrier to entry for crime and will stop mass shootings
frizzled
Oct 2015
#30
So to be clear, E38 -- you support the NRA, and think they should continue to thrive?
villager
Oct 2015
#15
Glad to see that you're standing watch for Communi... err, NRA sympathizers here
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#24
Since "NRA Sympathizer" means you, and since there's no moral difference between them
villager
Oct 2015
#26
"Since "NRA Sympathizer" means you..." A lie- and you are not the first to promulgate it
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#34
Or possibly preventing the NRA from denying the CDC relevant health related studies again
LanternWaste
Oct 2015
#46
I don't respond to vacuous inquisitions ("are you now, or have you ever been...")
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#49
No loss to him. It's also not the first time for that particular untruth of yours:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#66
There is no "proliferation" of "assault rifles, machine guns." These weapons are strictly regulated
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#47
How does someone seriously argue fewer restrictions pave the road to more restrictions?
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#4
What's really appalling -- and unsurprising -- is that they are here *defending the NRA*
villager
Oct 2015
#8
Exactly. And there is zero daylight between NRA defending, and anything else on that list
villager
Oct 2015
#17
A couple NRA defenders here claim to "Feel the Bern," but really they "Feel the Nuge"
villager
Oct 2015
#20
Yeah, I never used Ignore before but I found it enormously helpful. I was delighted with
CTyankee
Oct 2015
#31
Eleanors38 isn't the one that's been claiming that other DU members are NRA sympathizers
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#36
WP: "Most gun owners don’t belong to the NRA — and they don’t agree with it either"
villager
Oct 2015
#56
I'm guessing juror #3 needs to bone up on the Democratic Party platform...
cherokeeprogressive
Oct 2015
#68
Exactly. Plus I tend to resist "If you believe ____, you're not one of us!" kind of thinking.
cherokeeprogressive
Oct 2015
#70