Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 401(k)s Are a Negligible Source of Income for Seniors [View all]raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)6. They are great for people who want more conservatives to win.
Invest away in the most heinous corporations, think tanks and people on the face of the earth. Doing all one can to assure that our nation and the world at large will continue down its current path unimpeded.
Then go to rallies, go online and pretend to care about leaving a better world, about human rights, about climate change, about black lives, about perpetual war, about the least.
There are none so blind as those that refuse to see. We live in the most reality Wall St shareholders cannot they themselves fund the blocking of.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's false. Life expectancy after childhood has only changed by 2-3 years in the past 100 years
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#60
It's not as dramatic as you think - but changes should be made to strengthen social security - that
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#71
That chart is a misrepresentation of the facts. In 1983, Raygun changed how it is done.
fasttense
Oct 2015
#81
My parents are boomers (or a year or two older). I agree with you of course and
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#95
Being able to save is dependent upon having more income TO save, beyond everyday needs.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#3
It is our patriotic duty, in a time of war, to go shopping according to the
Ed Suspicious
Oct 2015
#20
Not really true. I've had to spend a bunch of money for medical (trans related) stuff, but other
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#56
you can save all you want, but unless you are one of the predator class, it will all be stolen
magical thyme
Oct 2015
#12
Not enough left after thieving asset owners and their lapdog politicians get theirs. n/t
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#118
I know - food, rent, medicine, diapers. Damn spendthrifts. And most people who get food stamps
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#121
You sound like a very passionate person. I think Evillocks would like you a lot. n/t
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#123
Most 401 (k)s) distribute only 50% of their value to the owner of the account the other 50%
DhhD
Oct 2015
#11
Well, that's a big reason I want retirement finds OUT of the hands of companies.
Adrahil
Oct 2015
#69
They have turned us all into members of the ownership class who now find ourselves rooting for
Ed Suspicious
Oct 2015
#25
not only pensions are almost non-existent, 401s are too. The stock market with a couple
shraby
Oct 2015
#9
When 401K's first started, republicans sold them as a supplement to your pension. They
B Calm
Oct 2015
#15
Nobody makes all that much. We are all "middle class." The fact of the matter is that you are able
Ed Suspicious
Oct 2015
#30
+1 Couldn't agree more! I was fortunate enough to stash away 30% of my income, but
B Calm
Oct 2015
#32
We have been subjected to one financial scam after the other from Wall Street.
Baitball Blogger
Oct 2015
#33
Well since they didn't exist until 81 and didn't become widespread until years later
whatthehey
Oct 2015
#46
Portability is only recent. And many 401ks are a mix of company stock and a handful of funds.
haele
Oct 2015
#74
Come on, folks. Reading the manual should alleviate a lot of the concerns with 401ks.
Kang Colby
Oct 2015
#98