Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. The US Constitution does not mention best or worst at anythng as qualifications for the office.
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 12:33 PM
Oct 2015
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.


The best or worst chess mater, car mechanic, brain surgeon, egotistical real-estate mogul with the vocabulary of a Dick and Jane book and a blatant example of failed modern business school philosophy meet the above qualifications for office

What citizens voters are supposed to do is decide who among all the applicants will best represent us in the office.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could there be a general ...»Reply #2