Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

(40,983 posts)
3. IOW, the crisis is not having access to one
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 05:54 AM
Oct 2015

That will come as news to many here who see 401ks as inherently evil.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And I bet most of them couldn't contribute the maximum. Ilsa Oct 2015 #1
I agree newfie11 Oct 2015 #4
How is that news - or related to a "401(k) crisis"? FBaggins Oct 2015 #2
I see you found the spin put on the story as well GummyBearz Oct 2015 #12
Bravo!! Kilgore Oct 2015 #15
IOW, the crisis is not having access to one BeyondGeography Oct 2015 #3
I don't see them as evil rather they are vulnerable liberal N proud Oct 2015 #5
They are indeed inferior to defined benefit pensions BeyondGeography Oct 2015 #6
Depends. A defined-benefit plan is subject to your employer's credit risk Recursion Oct 2015 #8
There is no 401k crisis. There's a guaranteed government retirement stipend crisis. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #7
So imagine everyone easily has access to an account to save for retirement. Vinca Oct 2015 #9
Was he unaware of the existence of IRAs? Kang Colby Oct 2015 #10
we are a nation of spenders, not savers DrDan Oct 2015 #11
I wonder 1939 Oct 2015 #13
Your income is taxed on a Roth exboyfil Oct 2015 #14
If I may, I think your language in the first paragraph needs a bit of clarification A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #32
a Roth shelters future earnings - current income still requires payment of taxes DrDan Oct 2015 #22
A Roth IRA can not "shield current income from taxes" A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #31
Even if we have a 401(k) . . .. HughBeaumont Oct 2015 #16
And you're the winner shrike Oct 2015 #21
Not really FBaggins Oct 2015 #26
Sorry, not correct. shrike Oct 2015 #29
As with all else, the answer is "simply have more disposable income" Orrex Oct 2015 #17
Anything that flows from capitalism is suspect to me. ronnie624 Oct 2015 #25
In 1999 I was hired by a mutual fund company Orrex Oct 2015 #30
I call BS on this Kilgore Oct 2015 #18
Did small restaurants offer defined benefit pensions before 401ks? whatthehey Oct 2015 #19
Imagine betting your retirement on the hope that Yupster Oct 2015 #20
There is nothing wrong with 401K's as originally conceived, i.e. in ADDITION to a good pension. stevenleser Oct 2015 #23
Exactly. You're probably too young to remember the three-legged stool concept shrike Oct 2015 #24
This guy simply didn't save money taught_me_patience Oct 2015 #27
Americans in general aren't great at delayed gratification FBaggins Oct 2015 #28
The guy worked in the resturant business. haele Oct 2015 #33
K&R! Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 401(k) Crisis Is Gett...»Reply #3