Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Photo showing Lee Harvey Oswald with same type of gun used to kill JFK 'authentic' [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)14. No need to get so frothy, SidDithers of DU.
You left something out:

From what Jack D. White told the House Select Committee on Assassinations:
Mr. GENZMAN. Based on your findings, what is your conclusion about the backyard photographs?
Mr. WHITE. Well, just as Oswald said, I think they are fakes.
Mr. GENZMAN. Do you regard these fakes as sophisticated or crude?
Mr. WHITE. They are extremely sophisticated, although they are not so sophisticated that the fakery cannot be detected. I deal in the graphic arts area all the time in my job. We frequently deal with photographers, commercial artists, people who do this sort of work. If we were to undertake to fabricate a photograph like either of these, we would go to an expert to do it. We would get somebody who was an expert photographer, an expert artist, or a commercial art studio, because it is obvious that to fabricate the head onto the body and then the body onto the background, several sophisticated techniques must be used, including a matting process. Matting, for the people who don't know about graphics, involves the use of masks and a pin-register system so that you can exactly superimpose something onto a background without the superimposure being noticeable. What you do is take the figure that you are going to superimpose on the background, and you cut a mask around this figure. You make a positive and a negative of this, using one of them to outline the figure and the other to knock out of the background the area in which you want to print the figure. It is a very sophisticated procedure. It is not something that the average person could do. These were not made, in my opinion, by somebody with just a pair of scissors and some paste.
Mr. GENZMAN. Do you have an opinion as to whether Oswald hypothetically could have made these fakes?
Mr. WHITE. Even though he said to Will Fritz that he knew something about photography and could demonstrate how these photos were made. I don't think he could have acquired the expertise to fabricate them in the few months he worked at Jaggars Chiles-Stovall in Dallas.
Mr. GENZMAN. Why do you think these fakes were made?
Mr. WHITE. It is fairly obvious after the fact that they were made to implicate Oswald in the alleged assassination by tying him to the assassination weapon.
SOURCE: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/hscawhte.htm
Speaking of left out, how much do you think War Inc sends Dartmouth's way each year?

From what Jack D. White told the House Select Committee on Assassinations:
Mr. GENZMAN. Based on your findings, what is your conclusion about the backyard photographs?
Mr. WHITE. Well, just as Oswald said, I think they are fakes.
Mr. GENZMAN. Do you regard these fakes as sophisticated or crude?
Mr. WHITE. They are extremely sophisticated, although they are not so sophisticated that the fakery cannot be detected. I deal in the graphic arts area all the time in my job. We frequently deal with photographers, commercial artists, people who do this sort of work. If we were to undertake to fabricate a photograph like either of these, we would go to an expert to do it. We would get somebody who was an expert photographer, an expert artist, or a commercial art studio, because it is obvious that to fabricate the head onto the body and then the body onto the background, several sophisticated techniques must be used, including a matting process. Matting, for the people who don't know about graphics, involves the use of masks and a pin-register system so that you can exactly superimpose something onto a background without the superimposure being noticeable. What you do is take the figure that you are going to superimpose on the background, and you cut a mask around this figure. You make a positive and a negative of this, using one of them to outline the figure and the other to knock out of the background the area in which you want to print the figure. It is a very sophisticated procedure. It is not something that the average person could do. These were not made, in my opinion, by somebody with just a pair of scissors and some paste.
Mr. GENZMAN. Do you have an opinion as to whether Oswald hypothetically could have made these fakes?
Mr. WHITE. Even though he said to Will Fritz that he knew something about photography and could demonstrate how these photos were made. I don't think he could have acquired the expertise to fabricate them in the few months he worked at Jaggars Chiles-Stovall in Dallas.
Mr. GENZMAN. Why do you think these fakes were made?
Mr. WHITE. It is fairly obvious after the fact that they were made to implicate Oswald in the alleged assassination by tying him to the assassination weapon.
SOURCE: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/hscawhte.htm
Speaking of left out, how much do you think War Inc sends Dartmouth's way each year?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Photo showing Lee Harvey Oswald with same type of gun used to kill JFK 'authentic' [View all]
tammywammy
Oct 2015
OP
Flinging a lot of invective there, must be bummed about the Canadian elections.
Jesus Malverde
Oct 2015
#6
JURY RESULTS (I guess some people aren't immune to being hidden, after all...)
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#41
It's only weird if you pretend it doesn't happen or hasn't happened, as you do. Tell me, randome,
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#56
Maybe posting the rantings of anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists isn't a good idea in the first place
YoungDemCA
Oct 2015
#83
I find it curious that you spend so much time attempting to exonerate JFK's actual assassin
YoungDemCA
Oct 2015
#77
I've conversed with Giorgio. He doesn't believe in most of what he says. But he makes good
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#51
A major call-out and a insult of a fellow DUer. Why are you allowed to do this when no one
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#31
Well there it is, hard evidence that a lone gunman, acting alone, killed JFK by himself.
Scuba
Oct 2015
#2
the head shot comes from the right front so unless that gun can magically fire bullets
GreatGazoo
Oct 2015
#5
It was common in the 50s and 60s for companies to purchase obsolete military rifles...
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#91
Shouldn't have been, but apparently plenty believed it was part of the/a conspiracy. n/t
tammywammy
Oct 2015
#68