Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,809 posts)
28. Typical CTist assertion, and not true.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:09 AM
Oct 2015

Obviously you've never read the Warren Report.

BTW - paraffin tests were and are unreliable. Law enforcement knew that back when they ran those tests on Oswald. Such tests were used to intimidate people into believing the law had evidence against them. To assert that a faulty test given to Oswald proved guilt or innocence is laughable. All it does is display the abject ignorance of the person making the claim.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #1
Flinging a lot of invective there, must be bummed about the Canadian elections. Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #6
LOL G_j Oct 2015 #13
No need to get so frothy, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Oct 2015 #14
Why do you even bother. Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #15
"The good fight." What a joke. stopbush Oct 2015 #30
LULZ Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #32
You all funny... Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #37
still laughing Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #40
that isn't funny at all...you really laughed at that LOL snooper2 Oct 2015 #70
OK it's a month early but LOLOLOL Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #72
Well WiffenPoof Oct 2015 #90
Yawn... stopbush Oct 2015 #29
Mountains of new information since Nov. 22, 1963 show what's stale. Octafish Oct 2015 #38
JURY RESULTS (I guess some people aren't immune to being hidden, after all...) ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #48
Thanks ChisolmTrailDem! Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #50
So a reference to "...from some homophobe, or racist, or anti-Semite..." randome Oct 2015 #53
It's only weird if you pretend it doesn't happen or hasn't happened, as you do. Tell me, randome, ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #56
Agglutination Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #59
LOL Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #57
"We all know who he was talking about." randome Oct 2015 #63
Welcome to DU! Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #64
Of course we did G_j Oct 2015 #65
Maybe posting the rantings of anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists isn't a good idea in the first place YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #83
D'oh! Now you're part of the Swarm! randome Oct 2015 #89
Well the swarm is all here, they probably got together and planned this out. Rex Oct 2015 #49
Yep, like flies to flypaper ... lol ... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #61
Wow, so now Dartmouth is part of the JFK cover up!!! stopbush Oct 2015 #74
I find it curious that you spend so much time attempting to exonerate JFK's actual assassin YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #77
I find it fascinating that some people think they know who did it. Major Hogwash Oct 2015 #86
OT madokie Oct 2015 #17
Giorgio Tsoukalos SidDithers Oct 2015 #18
Thanks madokie Oct 2015 #21
I've conversed with Giorgio. He doesn't believe in most of what he says. But he makes good ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #51
A major call-out and a insult of a fellow DUer. Why are you allowed to do this when no one ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #31
Listening to some house music on a youtube and my GF said Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #46
Well there it is, hard evidence that a lone gunman, acting alone, killed JFK by himself. Scuba Oct 2015 #2
Whether this photo is a fake or authentic has never been pivotal to me n/t deutsey Oct 2015 #3
Same Here ProfessorGAC Oct 2015 #7
DUZY!..nt Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #8
yup and "lone gunman" standing alone in a photo LOL Javaman Oct 2015 #11
LOL! Rex Oct 2015 #58
Those rifles were very common during that period PeoViejo Oct 2015 #4
Those rifles were sold in the classifieds catnhatnh Oct 2015 #73
the head shot comes from the right front so unless that gun can magically fire bullets GreatGazoo Oct 2015 #5
This is the evidence... CanSocDem Oct 2015 #12
Does that rifle have a scope? Darb Oct 2015 #9
I believe that he was a shooter. trumad Oct 2015 #10
I think he was just what he said, a patsy. Darb Oct 2015 #16
Sorry, didn't realize the rifle that killed Kenedy had a scope...... Darb Oct 2015 #25
It was common in the 50s and 60s for companies to purchase obsolete military rifles... Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #91
They did a paraffin test. Oswald never fired a gun that day. librechik Oct 2015 #20
Link please philosslayer Oct 2015 #26
FWIW, as far as "legitimate: and/ "CT" evidence in the assassination goes librechik Oct 2015 #54
Was that directed at me? philosslayer Oct 2015 #55
Typical CTist assertion, and not true. stopbush Oct 2015 #28
Ah, well if *Allen Dulles* says it, it must be true! villager Oct 2015 #52
The Shark tell a lie or step on toes!? Rex Oct 2015 #60
Allen Dulles was not the only person on the Warren Comission you know... YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #82
See Above ProfessorGAC Oct 2015 #45
Contrails. randome Oct 2015 #19
You win. zappaman Oct 2015 #22
What's over? Darb Oct 2015 #24
It was a coded reference to us non-CT'ers. You never know who's watching. randome Oct 2015 #36
Not just yet... Jesus Malverde Oct 2015 #66
Alright, where'd I put that spray bottle... NuclearDem Oct 2015 #34
Who listens to experts? AZ Progressive Oct 2015 #23
No amount of evidence will ever convince the JFK CT crowd. stopbush Oct 2015 #27
That's the catch. If you have evidence that runs contrary to the CT, NuclearDem Oct 2015 #33
Exactly. FLPanhandle Oct 2015 #35
+1. Apparently, we're all on the payroll of the "BFEE" YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #78
David Talbot has a new book out mountain grammy Oct 2015 #39
I haven't read that one IDemo Oct 2015 #43
I'll put that on my list, thanks. mountain grammy Oct 2015 #44
The head and neck sre too big for the body. GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2015 #42
LOL "same type of rifle", great but what about the one used to actually shoot JFK? Rex Oct 2015 #47
According to Wiki, 2 - 3,000,000 Carcanos were made, 1890 - 1945. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #92
His wife Marina provided that photo and said she had taken it struggle4progress Oct 2015 #62
Shouldn't have been, but apparently plenty believed it was part of the/a conspiracy. n/t tammywammy Oct 2015 #68
Funny, I've never noticed the pistol before justiceischeap Oct 2015 #67
World class experts are saying the picture is real trumad Oct 2015 #69
I've never been a CT'er in regards to this image justiceischeap Oct 2015 #71
So I guess this proves he lived in Texas. JackRiddler Oct 2015 #75
Actually, he lived in New Orleans. KamaAina Oct 2015 #80
et al. including CIA officer George Joannides. Octafish Oct 2015 #96
Sure, and then in Dallas. JackRiddler Oct 2015 #98
Why were the names of the papers whited out in this photo? former9thward Oct 2015 #76
I'm not sure why The Independent chose to do that tammywammy Oct 2015 #85
No complaint about you. former9thward Oct 2015 #97
Oswald murdered JFK, and he murdered J.D. Tippit YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #79
Few except the extra-strength tinfoilhatters believe Oswald was not involved. KamaAina Oct 2015 #81
Thats great but Jan Bunson Oct 2015 #84
Sipping a soda?! I thought I'd heard every possible angle by now!! KamaAina Oct 2015 #87
A conspiracy theorist claiming people are being paid? Prodigious! NuclearDem Oct 2015 #88
Welp, this may prove that Oswald owned a gun... Which is pretty much the same as having AzDar Oct 2015 #93
People love CTs, not boring like the truth. nt Logical Oct 2015 #94
Please see my user name oswaldactedalone Oct 2015 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Photo showing Lee Harvey ...»Reply #28