Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Iterate

(3,021 posts)
14. The word wasn't directed at you in any way whatsoever.
Fri May 25, 2012, 01:54 PM
May 2012

I don't do that shit. We're all on the same side.

In thinking back about what I did mean, the word was attached to an idea, a particular version of the events which was more obvious in other posts, even other threads.

And that was the idea that the German police in "marching with" were somehow joining the cause, or had changed sides, or were even more virtuous. I'd call that set of beliefs naive, or a fantasy, or in its worst form, childish. I'd call it that even if I held that belief myself. A more subtle variant is the idea that the peaceful nature of the march was somehow their doing because they showed restraint.

If I knew the police had orchestrated the idea with this pose, with this image, I'd have to call it sinister and masterful.

However it happened, it seems that this particular protest was thwarted successfully, even to the point where the final public message, headline, and conversation has been some variant of how the police, not the protesters, were responsible for its limited success. What ever you want to call it, it was effective.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From Occupy Frankfurt. Th...»Reply #14