Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
15. Global warming is only one factor
Fri May 25, 2012, 03:43 PM
May 2012

Other factors are exhaustion of easily extracted fossil fuels, depletion of soils, resistance to antibiotics and a decline in medical care, accumulation of various chemical and nuclear pollutants, rising religous conflicts, rising economic inequality, etc.

The only positive trend that I see is the growth of information technology and the increasing communication between all parts of the globe. It may be that this increases understanding and cooperation in ways that can solve some problems and avoid wars.

On the other hand, prior to WW I the continent of Europe was pretty well integrated by the recent developments of steamships, railroads, and telegraph. Most educated people spoke French, and the political, business and intellectual elites were in contact with one another. The heads of state were often first cousins.

It didn't help.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why would the government -ANY government- not have national security plans in place for this? randome May 2012 #1
The possible solutions are unpalatable, especially to democratically elected politicians FarCenter May 2012 #2
I sometimes forget that the hallowed halls of the security aparatus are still populated... randome May 2012 #3
The Plutocracy feels that if an environmental catastrophe does come Zalatix May 2012 #21
the pentagon already has reported that Climage Change is the greatest security threat we face magical thyme May 2012 #24
also, China's "one child" policy magical thyme May 2012 #26
Yes. nt. MH1 May 2012 #4
Well, there are many saying such things. longship May 2012 #5
As a scientist, you must be aware of the cyclic or quasi-cyclic behavior of large systems FarCenter May 2012 #7
No, I do not know that. longship May 2012 #9
So what would be your explanation for the data? FarCenter May 2012 #13
It is a more or less chatic socio-political system longship May 2012 #14
Global warming is only one factor FarCenter May 2012 #15
Sorry, cannot go there with you. longship May 2012 #17
You know, FarCenter has a pretty solid point here. Zalatix May 2012 #22
I'd guess our modern world economy is too fragile for world war. hunter May 2012 #6
Rwanda and Eastern Congo are good examples of war without much external support FarCenter May 2012 #8
would there be resources to fight a global war? paulk May 2012 #10
Depressing article. CrispyQ May 2012 #11
With oil gone in 20yrs, its going to be hard to move troops and equipment around CK_John May 2012 #12
and then there is Fukishima..... dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #16
We can't avert severe global warming at this point. It's very unlikely at current rates. Selatius May 2012 #18
I created an account here just to kick this thread FarCenter Fan May 2012 #19
Welcome to DU! gkhouston May 2012 #20
Thank you FarCenter May 2012 #23
I don't expect world war magical thyme May 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apocalypse Soon: Has Civi...»Reply #15