Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hatchling

(2,323 posts)
54. "today's seniors paid the Social Security and Medicare costs for their parents."
Fri May 25, 2012, 06:41 PM
May 2012

Not only thata but Boomers paid ahead for themselves as well, so as to not burden their children overly much.

The truth is, far from being greedy and robbing the next generation of workers, Boomers, for the first time in the history of the Social Security system, actually paid in advance into the Trust Fund in anticipation of the bigger drain on funds that would come when they all began to retire, at which point there’d be fewer younger workers paying into the system. Back in 1983, recognizing that the unprecedented wave of people born in the post World War II era would lead to a wave of retirees, Congress and the White House, under President Ronald Reagan, on the recommendation of a bi-partisan commission appointed by Reagan and headed by Alan Greenspan, later head of the Federal Reserve Bank, raised the FICA tax from 9.9% to 10.8%, and ultimately to 12.4%, paid half by employees and half by employers. This increase in funding built up a huge $2.4-trillion Trust Fund balance--one that was designed to be run down once the wave of Boomers began to retire (a point alarmist critics always fail to mention)...

http://thiscantbehappening.net/node/930

2) The Greenspan Commission recommended a major payroll tax hike to generate Social Security surpluses for the next 30 years, in order to build up a large reserve in the trust fund that could be drawn down during the years after Social Security began running deficits.

3) The 1983 Social Security amendments enacted hefty increases in the payroll tax in order to generate large future surpluses.

4) As soon as the first surpluses began to role in, in 1985, the money was put into the general revenue fund and spent on other government programs. None of the surplus was saved or invested in anything. The surplus Social Security revenue, that was paid by working Americans, was used to replace the lost revenue from Reagan’s big income tax cuts that went primarily to the

http://ampedstatus.org/how-your-social-security-money-was-stolen-where-did-the-2-5-trillion-surplus-go/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ryan's budget has something like this KT2000 May 2012 #1
Debtors' prisons can't be far behind Major Nikon May 2012 #2
WHEN THE GOP ENDS THE FEDERAL MANDATE UNDER MECIAID THE KIDS WILL BE FORCED TO PAY. TheMastersNemesis May 2012 #3
This will have dire consequences for the economy. GarroHorus May 2012 #4
I know dana_b May 2012 #15
When my father died, I couldn't believe who tried to hit me up for his only debt: His bookie! Petrushka May 2012 #24
. Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #53
That was my first reaction too . . . but . . . then it became the bookies' reaction when . . . Petrushka May 2012 #56
Is there any provision for the state proving left is right May 2012 #27
States with this evil law GarroHorus May 2012 #5
fascinating, thanks. n/t grasswire May 2012 #10
When the reality of this kind of law comes home to people, they will revolt, big time. CTyankee May 2012 #11
Thank you! It's interesting to note the difference between, say, WV, OH, & PA laws. (eom) Petrushka May 2012 #25
Thanks for sharing. nt ecstatic May 2012 #38
That's pretty interesting it's a mix of red and blue states... snooper2 May 2012 #39
thanks for this map! renate May 2012 #47
you wouldn't believe how fast I hit that site when I first read this article magical thyme May 2012 #58
This will make people commit suicide. woo me with science May 2012 #6
or murder. HiPointDem May 2012 #8
You're right. nt woo me with science May 2012 #9
Someone told me 30 states have laws marlakay May 2012 #7
That is what I was thinking... Kalidurga May 2012 #12
+1. These kinds of laws are atrocious. wickerwoman May 2012 #29
How can this be legal? Marr May 2012 #13
what a crock... this is seriously flawed... JCMach1 May 2012 #14
lovely.... dana_b May 2012 #16
If conservatives have their way. JDPriestly May 2012 #20
"It's a choice about being socially cohesive or socially divided." dana_b May 2012 #21
So who are all these conservatives in California who voted for this filial law? snooper2 May 2012 #41
Idiots who lived here before my time. JDPriestly May 2012 #50
"today's seniors paid the Social Security and Medicare costs for their parents." Hatchling May 2012 #54
Thanks. We've been had. JDPriestly May 2012 #55
Good luck checking on their plans Mariana May 2012 #28
yeah - that's helpful, right? dana_b May 2012 #44
I'd say these laws are bills of attainder, which are unconstitutional. NYC Liberal May 2012 #17
I have been warning younger people on DU about this for a long time. JDPriestly May 2012 #18
In the interest of accuracy ..... oldhippie May 2012 #37
The Hunger Games Amster Dan May 2012 #19
Confucian philosophy in american laws? when did this shit happen? Suji to Seoul May 2012 #22
How would that work if your mother & father divorced after willingly giving you to the State and Petrushka May 2012 #23
You can't work. I have been taking care of the wife for four years, and that is a full time job. sarcasmo May 2012 #62
That is fucked up. BlueIris May 2012 #26
And what if your parents abused you Shankapotomus May 2012 #30
Thirty states have this law? Was it one of ALECs "gifts"? Had YOU heard of it before? peacebird May 2012 #31
Holding an innocent person responsible for the debt of relatives... Larry Ogg May 2012 #32
As a matter of fact, I have heard Obama say that we are indeed, the envy of the world. SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #51
When he says, "We are the envy of the world!" he might have a mouse in his pocket… Larry Ogg May 2012 #61
Couple that with student loan debts and the current generation Javaman May 2012 #33
WTF? Why haven't I heard about this before? Odin2005 May 2012 #34
Don't the parents have to transfer their assets to their kids BEFORE this happens? uponit7771 May 2012 #35
Yes, I think that was the motivation for such laws -- IphengeniaBlumgarten May 2012 #42
Debt - the magical ever re-newing Gold Mine. Nt xchrom May 2012 #36
Well said. avaistheone1 May 2012 #40
The GOP Congress Has Passed Laws Against Transfer Of Assets TheMastersNemesis May 2012 #43
These laws are widespread, but most lawyers won't touch them Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2012 #45
The "sins" of the father visited upon the sons & daughters? Democrats_win May 2012 #46
We could make it a crime to be old and require nursing home care. hunter May 2012 #48
A new form of Safe Haven Law? FarCenter May 2012 #49
Actually, I wish I'd had that option for my MIL. Habibi May 2012 #63
CA just got rid of that practice Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #52
What do you mean 'got rid of'? Zalatix May 2012 #57
see attached. Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #64
Well I'll be darned. You just put a smile on a person's face tonight. Zalatix May 2012 #65
Bankruptcy for MR Pittas, what a messed up society we live in. sarcasmo May 2012 #59
And yet, Ken Lay's family is untouchable after he stole millions at Enron. Alexander May 2012 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Your Parents Can’t Pay...»Reply #54